We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Some of the most valuable features are how convenient and easy to use S3 is. It's nicely integrated with AWS and is available on the AWS console."
"The most valuable feature is the storage."
"Cloud infrastructure is the most valuable feature."
"Amazon S3 is very flexible and provides high storage."
"What I found most valuable in Amazon S3 is its versioning feature. I also like that you can create pre-signed URLs on the solution."
"I don't have any problems with the solution. It's issue-free."
"The solution is good and includes all the features we expect."
"The most valuable feature of the product is storage classes."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"It's a scalable product."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"The interface is good."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"The search option must be enabled in the UI to filter and retrieve files."
"It is expensive for storing."
"There are some scalability limitations."
"In the next release, I think that it would be good to have wizards that would update into specific applications, for example, a one-touch configuration in Pagemaker."
"Amazon S3 could improve the load balancers. They are very basic compared to other solutions in the industry, such as F5. It has to be able to be analyzed up to a certain level."
"I would also like S3 to have the ability to do dynamic websites without the need to do reconfigurations outside of S3. You should be able to switch on dynamic websites in S3, and then it works. I shouldn't need to go elsewhere within Amazon Web Services to get a dynamic website to work."
"The stability of the solution has room for improvement."
"I didn't find the user interface very friendly."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"The solution needs to add an archive function."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."
"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon S3 is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 70 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 13th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Amazon S3 is rated 8.8, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Cloud Conversations: AWS S3 Overview". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Amazon S3 is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier and Rackspace Cloud Files, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Wasabi and Amazon S3 Glacier. See our Amazon S3 vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
