We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and AuraQuantic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One of its most valuable features is the graphical user interface, providing a visual representation of the pipeline status, successes, failures, and informative developer messages."
"This is a simple tool to automate using Python."
"The best part of Airflow is its direct support for Python, especially because Python is so important for data science, engineering, and design. This makes the programmatic aspect of our work easy for us, and it means we can automate a lot."
"Designing processes and workflows is easier, and it assists in coordinating all of the different processes."
"We have been quite satisfied with the stability of the solution."
"The most valuable feature of Apache Airflow is creating and scheduling jobs. Additionally, the reattempt at failed jobs is useful."
"The solution's UI allows me to collect all the information and see the code lines."
"Apache Airflow's best feature is its flexibility."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"It's a low-code application."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"It would be beneficial to improve the pricing structure."
"Airflow should support the dynamic drag creation."
"We need to develop our workflow description and notations because out of the box, Apache Airflow does not provide some features that are needed."
"I want to see Apache Airflow have more integrations with more production-based databases since it is an area where the product lacks currently."
"For admins, there should be improved logging capabilities because Apache Airflow does have logging, but it's limited to some database data."
"The automation capabilities could be improved; a visual workflow designer and a graphical tool to reduce coding would be very helpful. But for now, it's sufficient for our simple workflows."
"Apache Airflow could be improved with the addition of more frameworks."
"I would like to see it more friendly for other use cases."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while AuraQuantic is ranked 19th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while AuraQuantic is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Camunda and Bizagi. See our Apache Airflow vs. AuraQuantic report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.