We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and QPR ProcessDesigner based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."From an architectural point of view, when you're looking at the business area, you can find all the information you have to use as an architect."
"The shared repository allows for cross-functional cooperation instead of doing things in a silo. You can operate cross-functionally and really work end-to-end, instead of dividing everything up on a functional basis."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to expose."
"The solution provides integrations to ServiceNow and other systems, flexibility of connectivity, and reporting."
"ARIS BPA is customizable as per specific business requirements."
"It helps the business make an informed decision."
"It has helped me get some ideas across more clearly to my colleagues."
"This solution has helped us in terms of discovering business processes."
"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."
"Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."
"It would be helpful if ARIS BPA could have a simple database to get the extract of various attributes."
"An area where it lacks and can be considered for improvement in the future is if we can somehow automate or learn how we can automate different processes."
"Integration with third-party tools should be improved (e.g. based on APIs)."
"They should make improvements as per customer requirements."
"One of the biggest challenges is to realistically enable the defined structures of the processes that you have in ARIS documented, and then actually implement them in the business."
"The governance mechanism could be better, as could automation."
"Sometimes, ARIS BPA breaks down, and its stability can be improved."
"Regarding stability, when there are any customized settings being done at customer end - post upgrade to newer versions - it makes the customer environment unstable for a short duration."
"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."
Earn 20 points
ARIS BPA is ranked 3rd in Business Process Design with 64 reviews while QPR ProcessDesigner is ranked 25th in Business Process Design. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while QPR ProcessDesigner is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QPR ProcessDesigner writes "FactView was easy to use and integrate". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Camunda, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Bizagi, whereas QPR ProcessDesigner is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our ARIS BPA vs. QPR ProcessDesigner report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.