We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Drupal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the documentation. It's a central platform, and there are many things that I can do with it. I'm very pleased about it."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The solution offers a lot of freedom when drafting directly online."
"What I like the most is the Wiki software that comes with Atlassian Confluence."
"What's most valuable to me in Atlassian Confluence is that it allows the concurrent development of documentation. I also like how you can add comments offline and implement changes directly on the document."
"There is a good library of templates for a wide range of needs."
"The most valuable feature of Atlassian Confluence it's very easy to use and there are different options."
"The sharing of information and simple formatting are valuable features. That is, there are no templates, and everything uses one format. This means that people don't need to worry about formatting."
"The feature I find most valuable is that Drupal is a framework and not only a CMS."
"We use a part of the solution called Acquia. The personalization portion of this is the most valuable aspect fo the solution."
"You can build websites on it very quickly."
"It is good for big projects."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing."
"Managing user permissions and credentials could be easier."
"It would be interesting if they had graphical templates that allowed typical agile ceremonies to be documented better."
"Atlassian Confluence is not really a community-friendly solution."
"It lacks ease of integration."
"The standard table capability is substandard and virtually unusable."
"The cost of the solution is too high."
"Atlassian Confluence could improve how information is shared outside our company. We had some negative experiences with the rights we have with our information when sharing it within Atlassian Confluence and with other teams outside the company. It's due to the limitations on the rights we have on the export capabilities. We don't have sufficient rights to do so."
"It is a little bit simplified."
"I think the support needs to improve, as well as the integration with tracking and analytics systems."
"The user experience in designing layouts should be much easier or much more helpful."
"Digital experience features like target, segmentation, and campaign management have a long way to go."
Earn 20 points
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 99 reviews while Drupal is ranked 4th in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals). Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Drupal is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Drupal writes "Through my different companies, we have developed many Drupal sites, from simple ones to complex E-commerce sites and custom made applications. The UI could be improved, though". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Microsoft OneDrive, Office 365, SharePoint and Liferay Digital Experience Platform, whereas Drupal is most compared with SharePoint, WordPress, Adobe Experience Manager, Liferay Digital Experience Platform and HCL Digital Experience. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. Drupal report.
See our list of best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.