We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and SAP Jam based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software."It's easy to use and you can create all types of pages."
"It is a very popular tool."
"The most valuable feature is the accessibility from different sites for different colleagues and the search option."
"Confluence can link any ticket or task from JIRA to be included on the Confluence page."
"It is stable and reliable."
"For me, the most valuable feature is its high performance. It's crucial for us in the bank, as we handle a massive number of transactions every day."
"Many people enjoy its zero learning-curve."
"With respect to our experiences with Confluence, we haven't had any issues."
"One notable feature is the "improvement training," which allows you to define groups, facilitate information sharing, enable participant rating, and establish rankings. This enables you to identify which participants are actively engaged and sharing information and which ones are less active."
"The cost of the solution is too high."
"The solution is not very user-friendly."
"I have a couple of different pipelines that I work with. However, I'd like to see them displayed differently on the same dashboard. So, I would like to have a unified dashboard to view the different pipelines."
"When you are creating a table in Confluence, there is no tool to export it into Excel sheet for quick references. We can only export it as an a PDF file, but not into an editable file."
"This is kind of by design, however, the lack of control in terms of editing the page to make it look the way you want it to look is an issue. It would be nice if there was more flexibility there."
"It would be good if they can continue working towards making documentation and editing as quick and easy as possible. It has got a lot of capability, but I don't know how to use it. I don't find some of the things that intuitive. Sometimes, it doesn't seem obvious to me how to use it, but it is like learning any new tool. You actually need to get trained on the tool to get maximum out of it."
"Confluence cannot replace Microsoft Word at the moment, so even though it can be used as a document management system, it is not meant for document creation, which adds a lot of limitations to it."
"The search function is not great."
"I'm hopeful for more integrations with SAP JAM in the future."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Social Software with 99 reviews while SAP Jam is ranked 7th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while SAP Jam is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Jam writes "A powerful tool for managing subscriptions within the organization". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Microsoft OneDrive, Office 365, SharePoint and Zendesk, whereas SAP Jam is most compared with Yammer, SharePoint and Microsoft 365 Business.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
