We performed a comparison between Atlassian Crowd and Okta Workforce Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One standout feature is the capability to configure various authentication and authorization methods from diverse user directories."
"The most valuable features are predominantly in the directory and development spaces."
"I am able to authenticate my users on cloud and SaaS applications such as Workday through Okta workflows."
"The initial setup of Okta Workforce Identity is straightforward. I was able to get an environment ready within half a day."
"Workforce Identity's best features include its user-friendliness and easy setup."
"I find the provisioning features and the integration with other applications useful."
"The most valuable features are ease of operation and visibility."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the integration with external websites one-factor authentication."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable features depend on a customer's needs. Our customers generally find multi-factor authentication very useful."
"It makes you more efficient, but you have to optimize what you're doing before you get into the software."
"There's a need for effective group membership management, especially for corporate programs."
"On the admin side, we can create our own passwords instead of generating one, which is usually difficult to explain to a user."
"Therefore, if you have 10 million users, that's almost 100 million, so it is costly."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve provisioning it can be made simpler."
"Okta Workforce Identity can improve by having more features in governance."
"The training is too costly."
"There should be automated aggregation and complete classification processes included in it."
"The guest user access could be improved."
"It's not compatible with on-premises installations, unless you host it as a SaaS. We were not able to do that. For example, imagine a scenario where the cloud is not available. Then, Okta will not work for you. That use case will readily fail because it doesn't have an on-premises installation that you can use to authenticate or provide identity and access management. If you have a purely on-premises solution that is not connected to the internet, then this will not work. This is one area that can be improved."
Atlassian Crowd is ranked 17th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 3rd in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 59 reviews. Atlassian Crowd is rated 9.2, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian Crowd writes "Enhanced user management offering seamless single sign-on, scalability for large enterprises, and improved configurability through integration with various user sources and directories". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Atlassian Crowd is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Saviynt and Auth0. See our Atlassian Crowd vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
