We performed a comparison between Avaya Spaces and Microsoft Teams based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software."The microphone's noise cancellation and static feature that record a human's voice are some of the most valuable features."
"The solution has improved internal collaboration. We can seamlessly interact on a number of documents by projecting them on the screen. This experience is not with internal teams but with clients as well."
"The recording function, the transcript function, the chat function, the live caption function, and the setting up of groups to share documents are useful features of Microsoft Teams."
"I think it has helped me organize my day-to-day activities. It has also helped me to align with the schedule of my colleagues and other partners because there's a feature where we can see the schedule of other Team members."
"Compared to Zoom, Microsoft Teams is a very good solution and works well."
"The video conferencing is good."
"The collaborating feature."
"The most valuable features are visual and audio, as they are very clear with no interruptions."
"One of the most valuable aspects is the ability to record sessions on Teams, which is a beneficial feature."
"There were some additional features coming up, as they informed us through email. But we didn't get any update on them."
"The product should improve its pricing."
"It consumes a high amount of system memory."
"The remote control needs some improvement."
"They should add an integration API for the solution."
"It would be better if Microsoft Teams can link us to the internet on the screen sharing mode during the meeting."
"The UI can be further improved upon. When I used to use Skype, Skype was a small window that opened on your desktop. With Teams, when you use it, it occupies your full screen just like if you were in Word or Excel. Skype worked more like an app, which I preferred. I liked being able to use it in a minimized screen. If Teams could emulate that a bit, it would be a better user experience."
"Sometimes, other participants cannot see the shared screen during meetings. The tool also needs to automatically switch to devices as we change them. When I try to switch audio from speaker to Bluetooth, I have to manually do that."
"Screen sharing sometimes causes the solution to crash."
Avaya Spaces is ranked 20th in Enterprise Social Software with 1 review while Microsoft Teams is ranked 1st in Enterprise Social Software with 145 reviews. Avaya Spaces is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Avaya Spaces writes "A collaborative tool with a good noise cancellation feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". Avaya Spaces is most compared with Fortinet FortiVoice, whereas Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony and Loom.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
