We compared Bitbucket and AWS CodeCommit based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Bitbucket stands out for its seamless integration with various tools, robust version control system, and efficient collaboration features. Users appreciate competitive pricing options, user-friendly licensing, and excellent customer support. On the other hand, AWS CodeCommit is praised for its efficient version control, integration with AWS services, reliable performance, security measures, and user-friendly interface. Areas for improvement in CodeCommit include lack of information on customer service, pricing, setup, and ROI. Additionally, suggestions for improvement include enhancing the user interface, navigation, and integration with other tools.
Features: Bitbucket's valuable features include seamless integration with other tools, a reliable version control system, and efficient collaboration capabilities. On the other hand, AWS CodeCommit offers an efficient version control system, seamless integration with other AWS services, reliable performance, comprehensive security measures, and a user-friendly interface.
Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket offers competitive pricing options and a straightforward setup process. The licensing options are flexible and user-friendly. On the other hand, no information is available regarding the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of AWS CodeCommit., The users reported positive ROI with Bitbucket, highlighting benefits like streamlined development, improved collaboration, and increased productivity. On the other hand, the ROI for AWS CodeCommit was not specified in the reviews.
Room for Improvement: Bitbucket could improve its user interface, navigation, and search functionality. Users also recommend better integration with development tools and platforms, and simplifying the process of setting up repositories and configuring permissions. In contrast, AWS CodeCommit has areas for improvement.
Deployment and customer support: Based on user feedback, Bitbucket users reported spending around three months on deployment and an extra week on setup, while AWS CodeCommit user feedback regarding duration is currently unavailable., Bitbucket users have expressed satisfaction with the prompt, efficient, and knowledgeable customer service provided. In contrast, no information is available about the customer service and support of AWS CodeCommit.
The summary above is based on 33 interviews we conducted recently with Bitbucket and AWS CodeCommit users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."
"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."
"It helps us to install our code idea projects."
"The setup of Bitbucket is simple."
"The setup was okay, and it was well-integrated."
"Bitbucket is a standard git implementation with perfectly coordinated screens, it's secure, and we have had no problems with it."
"The most valuable thing we have found is the workloads are good in Jira and we are able to control the access."
"We can watch the newly implemented code. So it's quite nice to organize the teams to see what part of the work is done and what part of the code is already old or new. It is very good for that kind of management."
"Bitbucket is feasible and friendly compared to Visual Studio DevOps on the Microsoft platform."
"Bitbucket is definitely a tool to consider if somebody is still on CVS. It is a great tool and well integrated with Bamboo."
"We use Bitbucket for Jira, Confluence, and Jenkins and we have an automation pipeline. Whenever the coaching is done in Bitbucket we run an automation pipeline from the build, create installations, and tests all in one pipeline. It is done automatically."
"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."
"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."
"The tool should improve its UI."
"Technical support is not very fast."
"Bitbucket doesn't currently offer AI functionalities."
"Bitbucket can improve by integrating a tool to manage conflict code. This would save time."
"The UI could be a little better compared to competing solutions."
"The scalability could be improved."
"The installation of Bitbucket on our server was not as easy as other Atlassian products, so it is something that can be improved."
"We need an improved automation feature for the cloud."
"It goes well with other Atlassian solutions like Jira or Bamboo, but integration with other third-party solutions is more complex."
AWS CodeCommit is ranked 5th in Version Control with 3 reviews while Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews. AWS CodeCommit is rated 7.4, while Bitbucket is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AWS CodeCommit writes "Offers convenient and cost-effective version control but lacks some advanced features and integration options ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". AWS CodeCommit is most compared with GitHub, Atlassian SourceTree and Bitbucket Server, whereas Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, GitHub, Atlassian SourceTree, IBM Rational ClearCase and Liquibase. See our AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.