We performed a comparison between Bitbucket and Liquibase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Bitbucket works, and it's reliable"
"BitBucket is a reliable and user-friendly product."
"Git is Bitbucket's most valuable feature."
"Bitbucket is a standard source code repository with all the features you would expect. It supports Git and SVN. It's an extensive tool that provides us with merging, branching, and change management capabilities. You can compare the changes with the current and previous versions."
"It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI."
"The setup was okay, and it was well-integrated."
"Code check in and code version control."
"We use Bitbucket for Jira, Confluence, and Jenkins and we have an automation pipeline. Whenever the coaching is done in Bitbucket we run an automation pipeline from the build, create installations, and tests all in one pipeline. It is done automatically."
"The solution is easy to use, and it has very clear documentation."
"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."
"It will be useful for teams to automate and reduce manual work."
"Bitbucket could improve search and indexing capabilities. There is only basic searching available. There is only the ability to index the main branch but not the subbranches. The search capabilities are dodgy."
"Even with the automation, we've had some situations where we've had mistakes. They've integrated things into the wrong place, so there's a fairly steep learning curve."
"The module component needs improvement."
"Fine tuning for procedures and features related to analytics and code validation is needed."
"The UI could be a little better compared to competing solutions."
"Bitbucket should come with code review pre-integrated, which would be better than integrating another tool into the solution."
"In future releases, more integration is always a valuable aspect to consider."
"The scalability for the cloud version can be improved."
"We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue."
"One thing we faced issues with is that Liquibase does not show the exact error, which added to the complexity."
"The pricing is quite high."
Earn 20 points
Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews while Liquibase is ranked 7th in Version Control with 3 reviews. Bitbucket is rated 8.4, while Liquibase is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Liquibase writes "Offers integration with multiple databases, stable product and reduced our manual intervention". Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, Atlassian SourceTree and Git, whereas Liquibase is most compared with Git and DBmaestro Database Source Control. See our Bitbucket vs. Liquibase report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
