We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and Bitbucket based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it is has been a good experience from my side using this solution."
"The setup of Bitbucket is simple."
"You can use Bitbucket to whitelist IP addresses during deployment."
"The product's most valuable feature is output backup."
"We have a couple of different tools that allow us to tie source code changes to report bugs. It's integrated with a bug tracking system and also integrated with what requires a tracking system. So we have better facilities. We get with the command line and can type all that stuff in and get the same kind of trust, but when we d it all manually, it's not likely to happen."
"We have approximately 300 to 400 users using this solution. Our whole organization uses it. I rate the scalability of Bitbucket an eight out of ten."
"We can watch the newly implemented code. So it's quite nice to organize the teams to see what part of the work is done and what part of the code is already old or new. It is very good for that kind of management."
"The code reviews and the ability to support DevSecOps are very important."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"I rate the support from Bitbucket a four out of five."
"I think the configuration can be improved because it is getting more complicated and not very well organized."
"I would like to see the tool's desktop version."
"The scalability could be improved."
"The UI could be a little better compared to competing solutions."
"There are many places where the product could be expanded to make it a more complete solution."
"One of the areas the solution could improve on is when there is a merging conflict it is quite confusing. When I am having a merging conflict I get stuck on the page, then I need to search how to handle the particular problem. For example, finding what the commands are which can be used."
"It would be beneficial to have a straightforward mechanism for integrating the initial tasks defined in Bitbucket with Jira when the need arises."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while Bitbucket is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Git, GitHub, Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit, whereas Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, IBM Rational ClearCase and Liquibase. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. Bitbucket report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.