We performed a comparison between Grafana and AWS X-Ray based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Grafana is the preferred choice over AWS X-Ray. Grafana offers extensive visualization capabilities, customization options, and a helpful community. It has a user-friendly interface, live monitoring, and the ability to connect with various data sets. Users have also praised Grafana's customer service and support. On the other hand, AWS X-Ray is commended for its error identification and resolution capabilities, as well as its compliance and security features. However, users have suggested improvements such as better log filtering and more KPIs.
"AWS X-RAY identifies bottlenecks in terms of stability and performance and how long certain data lives in terms of response time and duration."
"The solution has made it easier for us to trace the problems that we have with our requests and to monitor the timing of each step in each request we do in our endpoints."
"The most important one is compliance. We're able to achieve our regulatory levels. We're able to achieve the security level that we need for the federal government."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"The most promising feature of AWS X-Ray is that you can debug the issues through the proper logs. You can also get an analysis out of the logs for some use cases, though I have yet to try all the features of AWS X-Ray."
"AWS X-Ray is a strong solution and has a smooth integration process."
"The most valuable aspect is customization. There are many customizations possible, so I like that."
"Provides good dashboard visualization."
"The best feature was the creation of graphs and trends."
"It gives us the visibility we need. I like that when we add deployment markers or release markers, we know exactly when an issue arises. For instance, if there is an increased usage of CPU, we can link it directly to the deployment that might have caused the issue. It increases productivity and observability. We can now easily tell when a certain issue arises. It's way easier to debug because it can point you to certain things based on these markers, and we can debug easier."
"This solution provides valuable insights into the health of our infrastructure in real time."
"The initial setup is straightforward with just a few clicks on the solution's cloud."
"It provides a graphical representation and it's clear to see what's happening."
"Visualisation: It is easy to create beautiful, understanding graphs, snapshots to share the graphs with people who do not have access to Grafana, and templating to create powerful graphs."
"I do not have any notes in terms of improvements."
"They can improve how traces are sent to other providers."
"If you have a small team, it's probably overkill."
"The user interface is sometimes kind of confusing to understand. It's not very user-friendly."
"Like most Amazon products, the user interface, configuration, and tuning aren't the easiest. That's the biggest reason why people tend to go to products like TerraForm and Terragrunt. We use TerraForm and Terragrunt. So, for setting things up and interacting with X-Ray, it's definitely the user interface that can be better."
"What needs to be better in AWS X-Ray is the log filtering. Predefined filters could be helpful because the power of analytics comes from how you can filter the data. I also want to see more KPIs from AWS X-Ray."
"Grafana doesn't provide anything for reporting."
"The formatting could be better."
"Lacks in-depth graphs and sufficient AI."
"I would like the ability to download my results into any format in order to share the information with my clients."
"There is a need for improvement in automating daily monitoring reports, especially when alerts are triggered due to system downtimes or fluctuations."
"The solution should include online support."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"Setting up alerts via Grafana is a bit complicated, and alerting needs to improve."
AWS X-Ray is ranked 14th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 6 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 38 reviews. AWS X-Ray is rated 8.0, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS X-Ray writes "Saves time, is relatively cheap, and helps find errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". AWS X-Ray is most compared with Datadog, Azure Monitor, New Relic, Sentry and Dynatrace, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and AppDynamics. See our AWS X-Ray vs. Grafana report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.