We performed a comparison between BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite and Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM).
"Intune's feature that I have found most valuable is its auto-pilot feature."
"The most valuable feature is the policy CSPs."
"As the solution is a software as a service, the scalability is unlimited."
"We have found the solution is capable of scaling."
"This product works very well for companies already using the full Microsoft suite."
"The reporting and analytics features in Microsoft Intune have been a lifesaver."
"Intune's unified endpoint management platform is invaluable."
"The stability of Microsoft Intune is good."
"It was a big improvement to activate applications with one authentication. That was a big plus for the user experience."
"The containerization of the workspace is what we have found to be the most valuable."
"It has a good ease of use, and its intuitive."
"We were able to utilize Android for Work-Premium in BlackBerry Android devices."
"It gives us the ability to have a container and the most secure possible application."
"It was an improvement when we got the Tasks and the Notes as well as Connect for Skype For Business."
"There is very high flexibility for different setups of single users, so it can give a single use many different device types with different enrollment types."
"It does support hardware and operating system configurations from every angle."
"The solution is straightforward to set up."
"It's extremely competitive and very good for a product in this sphere."
"Security is the main feature because the company is reliable."
"The solution is easy to use and support."
"Meraki Systems Manager's most valuable features are password management, device tracking, remote resetting and wiping, device management, inventory management, and easy policy deployment."
"It's a very easy solution for the most part, it's very easy to implement and very easy to administer."
"The web portal provides status reporting and ease of configuration."
"I have found the location analytics feature that is built into the APs to be the most valuable. It allows you to compare data and to single out individuals who are repeatedly coming into your store. We can observe different trends. This is what separates it from a lot of the other solutions."
"The backend of Microsoft Intune needs to be improved. We have seen a little bit of delay as compared to other MDM solutions. That needs to be improved. A little bit more granularity should also be added"
"It's only good for a Microsoft environment."
"The current Intune reporting functionality could benefit from some improvements."
"Intune's areas for improvement revolve around security and certificate management."
"It would be helpful if there was proactive remediation."
"I'd suggest adding more features for macOS in Intune. There should be more functionality for managing macOS. There should be a better capability for pushing things down on macOS. Currently, Intune is not capable of managing macOS at the same level as Windows."
"Intune has some limitations when it comes to application updates for third-party applications. You can schedule an update, but when it's a package setup, you need to supercede and replace it each time."
"What would make this product better is adding more security policies and features in the next upgrade."
"The entry level support needs improvement, but a lot of it has to do with the fact that we do not have premium support. Therefore, we have to go through Level 1 support for any issues."
"The installations on the device could be simpler. It is a good solution, and all the features are there. So, there isn't a lot to improve. I'm sure they already have their thought process on how to improve it."
"Second level support needs to have strong knowledge of the product."
"I would like to see better integration with our AD. Instead of having to use Active Directory groups, we'd like to use Active Directory attributes instead. There is a lot of overhead in managing. Whereas, if we could key on something tied to HR, or some other feed indicating who they are or what role they have, and manage them that way, that would be much preferable than having to manage people with Active Directory groups. Because, if people move roles, then we have to make sure that we move them from one Active Directory group to another, which is hands-on, a lot of overhead."
"The newest features sometimes pop in very slowly."
"As far as being able to remotely wipe a device, or remove it from the console, this is not simple to do. It is not a one-click motion, as it requires several steps."
"I would like more support for Google Chromebook operating system, so I could manage it."
"Some users have complained that some features cannot be done through the BlackBerry Access Hub."
"Meraki is limiting our connections."
"They need to allocate more energy in terms of their offering to devices that are not Apple devices."
"It would be beneficial to have better integration with other OS."
"Because Cisco has improved a lot and is competing with other technologies that are innovative and brand new to the market, the only improvements they have to make are to keep up with the current competition and remain competitive with other solutions."
"There are problems with the connection on the client side, and the app that was deployed could be better."
"I've participated in numerous product launches primarily focused on HP and Dell. Consequently, there should be a vested interest in local gatherings to showcase product advantages and performance. Particularly in Singapore, it only has so limited integrators to engage in IP product sales. There's room for improvement through dedicated workshops and training. The European and Western markets differ significantly from the context here. The physical location holds more importance. Thus, they should have a survey to evaluate demand, supply, and sales points, tailoring strategies accordingly."
"The cost of installing this solution can be more expensive depending on who is doing the installation. Cisco is very expensive, and I'd like to see a reduction in cost."
"The tool's pricing needs to be more flexible like Cisco's."
More BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is ranked 17th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 24 reviews while Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is ranked 6th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 26 reviews. BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is rated 7.8, while Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite writes "Helpful technical support, and performs well, but initial setup could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) writes "Easy to use and excels in generating reports". BlackBerry Enterprise Mobility Suite is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, SOTI MobiControl and Ivanti Neurons for MDM, whereas Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM) is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, IBM MaaS360 and SOTI MobiControl.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
