We performed a comparison between BMC Remedy and BMC Track-It! based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Asset Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The incident management console is available out of the box."
"It has some good features for tracking. They also have a cloud and a mobile access feature."
"The asset discovery feature in BMC is notably better compared to ServiceNow."
"It's a scalable product."
"The service management features are beneficial – very good."
"It has a good peer sharing module."
"The most valuable BMC Remedy Asset Management are the dashboards and reports for the CIO."
"The solution offers some very good features."
"Our users have come to expect availability and quick responses, and we are able to provide this thanks to the Track-IT! solution."
"As a department, we have been able to identify problems and resolve them faster because of the centralized database."
"We use it to create and manage our work orders."
"Using their problem management process, we can use parent/child tickets and set up public views for our problem work orders."
"The initial setup is pretty easy."
"Track-It! has many features that help make us more efficient and cost effective as a department."
"Using the Help Desk and Purchasing modules, they let us keep track of all the issues in our organization and analyze them for trends."
"The customization of the product and reporting capabilities have allowed us to provide upper management the graphs (data) they request that helps validate specific needs that we (IT) have."
"Integration and deployment could be better. It could be easier and faster to integrate and deploy. It would also help if we could have a 360-degree view. It would be better if they changed it to a SaaS type of offering, which is becoming the standard."
"The UI is quite outdated."
"BMC Remedy Asset Management could improve by adding intuitive dashboards."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support."
"The product's scalability is one area with certain shortcomings that need to be considered for improvement."
"There are issues from a product functionality perspective."
"I would like to have more customized reporting because the management team loves customized reports with graphs."
"The upgrade process could be better. It would be a good improvement."
"Their self-service is not user friendly."
"Track-It! works great for a mid-size company, but anything over 700 employees, and trying to use Track-It! for any other areas of the business is difficult."
"The solution is cumbersome to use."
"There are a few items that I would like changed or extra features that could be added to our current version of this software, but those are all going to be addressed in a future software update."
"The product’s current version could be easier and straightforward to work with small IT organizations, similar to the older version."
"The area where we would like to see improvement is in the asset management module."
BMC Remedy is ranked 5th in IT Asset Management with 23 reviews while BMC Track-It! is ranked 18th in IT Asset Management with 5 reviews. BMC Remedy is rated 8.0, while BMC Track-It! is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of BMC Remedy writes "Offers automation, orchestration, service level management but lacks AI-based rules ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BMC Track-It! writes "Provides good stability, but it could be intuitive and easier to use". BMC Remedy is most compared with ServiceNow, BMC Helix Discovery, Snow License Manager and Qualys VMDR, whereas BMC Track-It! is most compared with ServiceNow. See our BMC Remedy vs. BMC Track-It! report.
See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors and best License Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.