We performed a comparison between Brinqa and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities."
"One of the useful features is the ability to connect to various systems in order to accommodate data."
"Its user interface is pretty neat, and there is flexibility in generating the data. You can customize reports at any level. You can directly get reports in Tableau format. If you want to generate statistical data, you can create reports with graphs. There is an adequate amount of flexibility for changing the format, the type of graphs, etc."
"RSA Archer's best features are advanced workflow, reports, dashboards, and notifications."
"It has various valuable features. For example, showing us if a control aligns with specific standards or frameworks helps us understand it better and verify its compliance."
"First of all, its access control feature where it provides application level access, solution level access, and even recall access, as well."
"Flexible record permissions and data import features."
"It has the best workload management features."
"The most valuable feature is the enterprise module, which provides the capability of having all of the information stored and linked with everything else."
"Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision."
"The solution can be a little slow due to the Silverlight feature."
"There should be a way to export and get data from the system in PDF or PowerPoint presentation format. This would be a great addition."
"Solution could use more inbuilt applications."
"The first improvement I would suggest for RSA Archer is a better search feature. The search criteria needs to be improved. Sometimes I do a search and the search doesn't return the exact item I'm looking for. RSA Archer could also be improved by being more user-friendly. Maybe I have been using a limited version of RSA Archer, but I'm not sure whether it has ESG, environmental and social governance. In the next couple of years, ESG is the next feature that will be integrated into GRC tools. I would recommend RSA Archer adds ESG."
"When we have to do formulas or some other type of calculation in Archer, it sometimes doesn't work correctly. The fields don't display right, and we have to contact RSA Archer support to fix things. I think the calculation components are a bit complicated."
"Some areas are not truly automated but are only scheduled."
"It would be nice if RSA Archer featured more customization. When customers are updating, they should be notified whether certain updates are optional. The install screen should not proceed to the next page unless we make some selections about which updates we want to install."
"Recently, we made a suggestion for cross references, like for one application to another. There were limitations there, so we're hoping that will be included in the next upgrade."
Brinqa is ranked 14th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. Brinqa is rated 7.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Brinqa writes "Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". Brinqa is most compared with Vulcan Cyber, Axonius, Avalor, Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and Nucleus, whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance and Workiva Wdesk.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.