We performed a comparison between Camunda and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
"The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now."
"The product is stable."
"The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"I think that the positives of Camunda Platform are that our customers can start with the free version. I think it is the most important."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"The support team responds fast."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB."
"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."
"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."
"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."
"The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training."
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."
"It is not difficult to change existing processes. The difficulty was in integration, for example, to call an external web API, and in the security capabilities, to use a vault for secrets. That was difficult."
"The Camunda Modeler installation poses a challenge, requiring local installation, which doesn't help collaboration like other online tools, for instance."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform, Appian and OutSystems. See our Camunda vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
