We performed a comparison between KiSSFLOW and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"The support team responds fast."
"The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"The integration capabilities have been very useful."
"It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools."
"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."
"Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity."
"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."
"It saves time as tasks are automated."
"I really like the visual representation. It actually looks like a flow chart, which is nicer than a SharePoint Designer workflow, which doesn't have that ability."
"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful."
"The security features for this solution need to be improved."
"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."
"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."
"Built-in reporting on-prem is limited and clunky at best."
"We cannot use the same solution on cloud."
"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."
"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."
KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". KiSSFLOW is most compared with Camunda, Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Appian and OutSystems, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Newgen OmniFlow. See our KiSSFLOW vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
