We performed a comparison between Camunda and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation."
"The ease with which I can define workflows is most valuable. The latest updates and flexibility that it provides around a task activity are interesting for me."
"The graphical interface is very beneficial."
"It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen."
"I think that the positives of Camunda Platform are that our customers can start with the free version. I think it is the most important."
"One reason we selected Camunda or Cloud/DB is that it comes with the support of the BPMN notation, which helps to define processes in a standard manner. Another reason was that Camunda Cloud, as the name says, is designed for a new cloud era."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"It is an absolutely stable solution."
"With an extensive list of integrations with LOB data, your workflows can extend far beyond SharePoint, driving adoption of SharePoint."
"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."
"It leverages the out-of-the-box SharePoint back-end. This means that you don’t need to install or deploy additional infrastructure to support Nintex Workflow, unlike some of its competitors."
"It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper."
"This tool set makes it easy to integrate current processes and increase adoption rates and usage for the tool, as well as the process changes to update it on the fly."
"It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."
"I think the initial setup is fine."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."
"The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"An improvement would be to support Angular 2 instead of AngularJS, which is quite old."
"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."
"We have faced problems with the performance."
"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."
"I think it was lacking a little bit in its multiple in-house processes and other processes. So there is a little bit of a gap in collaboration."
"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."
"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."
"While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful."
"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."
"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Visio, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM, Bizagi and AgilePoint. See our Camunda vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
