We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It creates workflows to handle business processes. It allows us to route approvals to users without human intervention."
"It is a scalable product."
"It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."
"Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email."
"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."
"Allows us to provide desktop/laptop and mobile solutions to our users."
"Valuable features include workflows (escalation, reminder, LazyApproval, actions, etc.) and ease of use."
"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."
"The workflows are the most valuable features, particularly for us, because we were attempting to automate processes by utilizing workflows to provide a hands-off comparison between the bot and the human."
"The solution's case management is its most valuable aspect."
"Scalable and stable BPM software with a powerful case management feature. It also has good workflow."
"Application development is very rapid. A lot of code gets reused while building the applications, which is something we highly appreciate."
"This solution is useful for business process management if you have any banking solutions or need to manage a process."
"Pega BPM's most valuable feature is the use of CDX to solve problems."
"In general, we use web services to integrate this solution with our other tools. It is the main approach we use with this solution and it integrates with all tools that we need. If you want to integrate with other solutions such ThreatFire or similar, it is possible as well."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is its architecture."
"We would like to have access to an on-premises solution. In our country, we have a relationship with Central Bank of Egypt, which do noes not allow cloud solutions to be used. They should offer an on-prem solution with a flexible price license."
"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."
"While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful."
"Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement"
"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."
"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."
"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."
"Built-in reporting on-prem is limited and clunky at best."
"Its implementation in the public sector was a bit complex."
"The initial setup takes time."
"We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies."
"The pricing model needs to be improved. Right now, it's too expensive."
"The main problem with Pega is that it is quite complex, so it is very difficult for the developer to learn."
"If it could also be integrated with robotics, it could help with a lot of things, even if we don't have APIs, we could still talk to other applications. If it could invoke a bot, for example."
"It is scalable, but it also interacts with a lot of other systems. I think they thought that the interface to other systems, legacy systems, was its strength, but when problems do occur, quickly diagnosing those problems has been a challenge."
"I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Bizagi and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, IBM BPM and Microsoft Power Apps. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
