We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have used a lot of out-of-the-box reporting on the process performance metrics. We have been able to make suggested changes to staff for this role or streamlining by eliminate some activities where people were not requiring a lot of work in the first place."
"It helps maintain, and in many instances, lower costs, as well as to maintain those costs, keeping them stable."
"It is being able to see the process, and understanding what the process is versus having to bury it in code somewhere."
"It makes the company business processes work more efficiently."
"The process creation."
"The solution is stable."
"We are implementing the tool to triple our monthly transaction volume."
"The integration and design are valuable features."
"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"K2 is reasonably priced."
"It can scale well."
"The setup is easy."
"It creates workflows to handle business processes. It allows us to route approvals to users without human intervention."
"The technical support is very good."
"Allows us to provide desktop/laptop and mobile solutions to our users."
"The solution has helped us to automate our business processes, our approval systems, and automation for quickly developing on SharePoint on-prem and SharePoint online."
"Importing and exporting between multiple environments is more difficult with other tools."
"IBM BPM's UI is an area with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"We would appreciate more user-friendly definitions of processes with a more user-friendly interface for documenting processes."
"It is a rather thick stack because you have to have WebSphere skills, IBM BPM skills, and an understanding of how the product runs on WebSphere. A lot of this will start to get a lot easier as they put it in containers, which will allow the platform to manage itself in some regards."
"There needs to be better documentation for IBM BPM in a central place. There is not any standard documentation for each component available and has been a barrier for developers."
"Process Server is no more available than new products out there, but in general IBM has a high cost and complex setup."
"The people working on the front desk are having some problem with managing the documentation. For instance, they get a picture, and if the picture comes rotated 90 degrees, together with a picture that is not rotated, they have some problems dealing with that, technically. There are some minor aspects that on the usability side that are still lacking. That has to do with FileNet, too, I'm talking about the suite together."
"It can definitely be improved in terms of performance and stability."
"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."
"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper."
"We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
"I think it was lacking a little bit in its multiple in-house processes and other processes. So there is a little bit of a gap in collaboration."
"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."
"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."
"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and webMethods Integration Server, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, Bizagi and AgilePoint. See our IBM BPM vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.