We performed a comparison between Camunda and Oracle BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."
"Camunda is a scalable product."
"I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite."
"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."
"Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes."
"The product has a good task management engine."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"I think that the positives of Camunda Platform are that our customers can start with the free version. I think it is the most important."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle BPM is that it has a lot of out-of-the-box integrations. The solution also provides a lot of adapters which is very helpful."
"The benefit from the tool is we can develop it quickly and easily use it for middleware services. We can publish the services so other applications can consume them. This is providing us some reusability and a type of security."
"It has developmental accelerators, which allow for virtually any customization needs which you may require."
"The support is good."
"This solution has given us a quick time to market, the ability to integrate with the rest of the corporate applications, and the ability to hire talent in low-cost locations."
"The processor management system is quite fast and scalable. We have 10 developers using this solution and it supports 25,000 users."
"One of the most valuable features is its user-friendly API, which simplifies the implementation of workflows, such as managing inbox tasks for specific users within BPM profiles."
"We selected this solution not only for the BPM but for the entire package."
"When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"The initial setup can be complex for business users."
"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"When you search for Camunda BPM resources or books on how to utilize Camunda BPM, it is lacking. When it comes to Alfresco, there are thousands of resources that can help you to utilize within AWS and its Group Services. I would like to see the usage of Camunda BPM on Amazon Web Services be improved."
"While it's very scalable, it would be great if auto-scaling capabilities were added to it... one area that really could help out would be to have dynamic resizing of the cluster. Right now, you have to do capacity planning."
"From my knowledge of this solution, I don't see that the Oracle BPM includes features such as the growth of discovery and process mining."
"Though Oracle BPM is a stable solution, it's very heavy, so this is one area for improvement. If Oracle can make the components of Oracle BPM lighter, and if the deployment for the solution could be easier, that would make Oracle BPM better."
"The time it takes to get from deployment to production could be faster."
"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."
"You have to maintain it manually."
"It could have easier administration. It takes time to configure and deploy."
"Existing APIs in the product need to be fine-tuned, made more robust and flexible for adoption."
"Oracle BPM is hard to configure."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while Oracle BPM is ranked 14th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 22 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Oracle BPM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Stable, has a lot of features and out-of-the-box integrations, but it's heavy, and the technical support isn't good". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM and IBM BPM, whereas Oracle BPM is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, IBM BPM, AWS Step Functions, Apache Airflow and ARIS BPA. See our Camunda vs. Oracle BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
