AWS Step Functions vs Oracle BPM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
3,967 views|3,354 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
1,963 views|1,597 comparisons
77% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Step Functions and Oracle BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Step Functions vs. Oracle BPM Report (Updated: June 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is stable...The solution is easy to scale.""It's a general solution that you can adapt to your own needs and is simple to use. We like that it can be integrated with everything in the AWS suite, and that the creation of the pipeline can be done using the graphical user interface.""The integration capability is easy, whereas building state machines is tricky.""It's Amazon, it's scalable.""AWS Step Functions acts as a high-level layer, allowing us to seamlessly integrate with microservices.""The number of historical events is great.""What I like the most about Amazon Step Functions is how easy it is to use.""One can rate all the calls and that is a good feature."

More AWS Step Functions Pros →

"I find the data lineage features most valuable.""We selected this solution not only for the BPM but for the entire package.""The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace.""The processor management system is quite fast and scalable. We have 10 developers using this solution and it supports 25,000 users.""The most valuable feature is the complete workflow through the BPM, from making it available as a generated code based on the backend, deploying it in the test environment, and then going to production.""The Workspace is a full, rich application where most users can find what they want. It shows them a list of their work.""Our company is based around Oracle processes. It provides a lot of flexibility in its processes.""What I found most valuable in Oracle BPM is that it has a lot of out-of-the-box integrations. The solution also provides a lot of adapters which is very helpful."

More Oracle BPM Pros →

Cons
"The pricing of the solution can be improved.""Setup took about one day. We had some errors to understand in the beginning, but now everything is working good.""The solution's pricing could be cheaper. It is cheaper than Airflow.""The solution's data size limit can be improved.""It wasn't easy to understand the licensing model. It's like if you use just a little, it's cheap, but it becomes more expensive as you use more. It's like a hook that ties you inside the Amazon ecosystem. So, it creates a dependency.""The interface can sometimes feel limited, as we're unable to see what AWS is running behind the scenes.""It is hard to coordinate the declaratory language.""I would like to see more data transformation features in Amazon Step Functions like additional operators and logic."

More AWS Step Functions Cons →

"It could have easier administration. It takes time to configure and deploy.""The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace.""Oracle BPM is hard to configure.""You have to maintain it manually.""Existing APIs in the product need to be fine-tuned, made more robust and flexible for adoption.""It would be good if they could provide some additional connectors or an application developer environment for microservices.""Pricing is an area that could use improvement.""From my knowledge of this solution, I don't see that the Oracle BPM includes features such as the growth of discovery and process mining."

More Oracle BPM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution's price is reasonable."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More AWS Step Functions Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "As with all Oracle products, the licensing over VMware is an issue."
  • "The licensing model is good."
  • "It's pried high, this solution is expensive."
  • "The licensing for this product is very costly. We pay for a yearly license to use Oracle BPM."
  • "This solution is very expensive. You are charged per license and an additional 20% for support."
  • "I don't have information on the exact cost of Oracle BPM because a different team handles that, but it's pretty high. Oracle products are very costly. I would rate pricing for Oracle BPM three out of five. Though the pricing is high, the solution has a lot of features."
  • "Oracle is good, but they're still expensive compared to other vendors."
  • "The pricing is very expensive."
  • More Oracle BPM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The integration capability is easy, whereas building state machines is tricky.
    Top Answer:The major feature of AWS Step Functions is interdependency. Step Functions can determine what action to take next if one step returns a false status based on predefined logic. Step Functions aims to… more »
    Top Answer:For Step Functions error handling, one must use function calls and logging for error detection within state machines. Comparatively, AirFlow offers more room for improvement. It's like drag and drop… more »
    Top Answer:The solution provides extensive functionalities.
    Top Answer:The pricing is significantly high, particularly for Brazil where fluctuations in the exchange rate between the dollar and the real can further increase the cost of Oracle licenses.
    Top Answer:The product must reduce its cost. It will help it compete with other open-source tools evolving in the market.
    Ranking
    Views
    3,967
    Comparisons
    3,354
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    489
    Rating
    7.7
    Views
    1,963
    Comparisons
    1,597
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    502
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Step Functions, Step Functions
    Oracle Business Process Management
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Step Functions lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows so you can build and update apps quickly. Using Step Functions, you can design and run workflows that stitch together services such as AWS Lambda and Amazon ECS into feature-rich applications. Workflows are made up of a series of steps, with the output of one step acting as input into the next. Application development is simpler and more intuitive using Step Functions, because it translates your workflow into a state machine diagram that is easy to understand, easy to explain to others, and easy to change. You can monitor each step of execution as it happens, which means you can identify and fix problems quickly. Step Functions automatically triggers and tracks each step, and retries when there are errors, so your application executes in order and as expected.

    The Industry's Most Complete and Unified BPM Solution A complete solution for all types of processes that provides a unified process foundation, user-centric design, and social BPM interaction. Reduces complexity and risk and increases business efficiency, visibility, and agility.
    Sample Customers
    Alpha Apps, The Guardian, SGK, Bigfinite
    State Revenue Office Victoria, New South Wales Health, REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P Indonesie
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Insurance Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company36%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise77%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS Step Functions vs. Oracle BPM
    June 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Step Functions vs. Oracle BPM and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Step Functions is ranked 12th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 9 reviews while Oracle BPM is ranked 14th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 22 reviews. AWS Step Functions is rated 7.8, while Oracle BPM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of AWS Step Functions writes "Simplifies complex task automation and enhances development workflows while offering user-friendly interface, seamless scalability and efficient workflow orchestration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Stable, has a lot of features and out-of-the-box integrations, but it's heavy, and the technical support isn't good". AWS Step Functions is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Pega BPM, Apache Airflow and IBM Business Automation Workflow, whereas Oracle BPM is most compared with Camunda, SAP Signavio Process Manager, IBM BPM, Apache Airflow and ARIS BPA. See our AWS Step Functions vs. Oracle BPM report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.