We performed a comparison between Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ZTNA as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is efficient and easy to use."
"The solution is stable."
"I haven't had any trouble, and practically forget that I'm using it."
"It's a pretty straightforward solution."
"The solution is a simple WAN solution. We've onboarded the socket on the Cato platform, and it provides connectivity. There is no complex routing."
"The product is very simple, and everything can be done very quickly."
"The most valuable feature is that it also works as a next-gen firewall because it has security features."
"It is a stable solution...it is a scalable solution."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Scalability-wise, it is an easy solution to scale up. I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the ease with which one can use it."
"The initial setup wasn't too difficult."
"The solution's speed, processing power, and user functionality are some of its most valuable features."
"The solution can be used for building the infrastructure on the cloud."
"The most valuable features of Google Cloud Platform are the Kubernetes engine, CI/CD, and BigQuery."
"The app provides ready-made services that we can talk to without issue."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pros →
"I am located in South Korea, and I can say that most people here have no idea about Cato Networks. I think Cato Networks should promote its network services in various countries."
"Its functionality is a bit limited in some areas as compared to a Cisco solution. It is not as granular. It doesn't have the manageability, feature set, and capabilities of a larger or an enterprise-level solution. It just needs a more robust feature set and granularity."
"We would like the product to continue to improve its security."
"The solution could be made more user friendly for the administrator to use the portal. It is difficult to use it for people who are not experienced with Cato Networks."
"The different languages in the user interface should be enhanced."
"I would like to see better integration with identity providers."
"The tool needs to be more granular. Its reports are not very in-depth."
"The product may be complex for users with few years of experience."
"The product’s migration process could be easier to understand."
"The stability regarding voice commands in the solution has certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"Despite using GCP for all the resources, potential clusters on GCP caused difficulties."
"People who don't have experience in IT may find the tool challenging. It needs to improve its pricing."
"I think this product needs to shift the focus from our software, our solution, like social media analytics to our customers; not maintenance in the hardware."
"The initial setup was quite complex."
"Sometimes, it just fails to get some documents, and then it resumes normally. Google should work to enhance the overall features of the solution."
"Google Cloud Platform is not a product that is very flexible for end-users, especially owing to the fact that there is not much documentation available for the product."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Cons →
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cato SASE Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in ZTNA as a Service with 21 reviews while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is ranked 5th in ZTNA with 44 reviews. Cato SASE Cloud Platform is rated 8.8, while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cato SASE Cloud Platform writes "Useful remote worker VPN, centralized management, and simple on-boarding process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy writes "User-friendly, easy to navigate, and intuitive interface". Cato SASE Cloud Platform is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cisco SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate and VMware SD-WAN, whereas Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is most compared with Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cisco Duo and FortiGate Next Generation Firewall (NGFW). See our Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy report.
See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors and best ZTNA vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.