We performed a comparison between Cegid and PeopleSoft based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has a great payroll engine."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the payment engine."
"The most valuable features of Meta4 are payroll and resource recruitment. However, all of the features in the human resource system are useful."
"The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature."
"Performance appraisal might be the most valuable feature for us."
"The support team were friendly and work in a systematic way. When contacting support you are able to add a level of priority to your case which is always respected by their team."
"The most valuable feature is you can customize every type of payroll calculation that you have."
"The tool provides a lot of options."
"Flexibility in configuration."
"All the features of the solution are integral to the functionality. Additionally, the navigation customization is beneficial."
"I'd like PeopleSoft to be like on the cloud and more mobile-friendly. If I try to access it from a cell phone, it's a bit difficult, so it would be great if PeopleSoft could improve these features."
"I use the reporting feature occasionally to check for potential improvements in timesheets. We have integrated it with Power BI."
"PeopleSoft is scalable."
"The PeopleSoft interface is very good."
"Peoplesoft is the best payroll software in the market."
"The solution is easy to scale, expand and make bigger."
"I would like to have recruitment and acquisition features added to this solution."
"The solution is a little bit slow."
"The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement."
"Meta4 could improve by allowing users to manage things by themself."
"The HR portal, training model, and development career model could all use improvement. Stability and scalability should be improved as well."
"In future releases, it would be useful to see reporting lines of all the team members in our business to understand who reports to whom."
"training and performance could be improved."
"The user interface could be improved and the maintenance is complex when it comes to upgrades."
"The solution's initial setup is not straightforward."
"We have already deployed it and we have had it for several years but we are switching to a modern HCM SaaS cloud product."
"The whole systematic flow of any query raised to HR should be improved."
"Response time takes very long and requires a person to be awake night and day to benefit from it."
"PeopleSoft lacks integration capabilities."
"Tools and UI could be enhanced."
"The Time and Labor module is not that flexible."
"The solution could have better processes and automation, or features that allow for a paperless environment."
Cegid is ranked 22nd in Talent Management with 12 reviews while PeopleSoft is ranked 5th in Talent Management with 80 reviews. Cegid is rated 7.2, while PeopleSoft is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cegid writes "Facilitates reusability, loads massive data, and creates reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". Cegid is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, SAP HCM, UKG, BambooHR and Workday, whereas PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP and SAP ERP. See our Cegid vs. PeopleSoft report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.