We performed a comparison between Cegid and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud HCM solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is you can customize every type of payroll calculation that you have."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the payment engine."
"The support team were friendly and work in a systematic way. When contacting support you are able to add a level of priority to your case which is always respected by their team."
"The solution has a great payroll engine."
"The tool provides a lot of options."
"The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature."
"Performance appraisal might be the most valuable feature for us."
"The most valuable features of Meta4 are payroll and resource recruitment. However, all of the features in the human resource system are useful."
"Customers can create custom infotypes to store any custom data points."
"When you maintain your data in SAP, you can generate any kind of HR report with one click."
"The tool's most valuable features for our HR operations include easy reporting capabilities, which allow us to generate reports for management meetings and auditing purposes. Additionally, it supports appointment preparation and processing benefits."
"We've found that the solution has the capability to scale."
"I like the talent, recruitment, and learning features the most."
"We are satisfied with the reporting by SAP HCM."
"It simplifies everything for human capital management, and all users can do self-enrollment for leaves and those kinds of things. The employee self-service feature is quite a powerful feature for me. You can install it on your mobile phone or iPad and do your employee service activity there."
"The setup was straightforward."
"Meta4 could improve by allowing users to manage things by themself."
"I would like to have recruitment and acquisition features added to this solution."
"The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement."
"The user interface could be improved and the maintenance is complex when it comes to upgrades."
"training and performance could be improved."
"The solution is a little bit slow."
"In future releases, it would be useful to see reporting lines of all the team members in our business to understand who reports to whom."
"The HR portal, training model, and development career model could all use improvement. Stability and scalability should be improved as well."
"The organizational structure visualization could be improved in future releases. The solution has a very poor interface."
"HCM could improve compatibility, making it more accessible via web applications and graphical interfaces."
"SAP now does the most innovation for the cloud solution and less innovation for the on-premises client."
"Reports need to be added on the time management side."
"The current platform is quite rigid and not as flexible and end-user friendly as other HR solutions."
"A better user interface and greater AI integration are crucial."
"SAP HCM's long and tedious transactions can be improved."
"It would be nice if the solution migrated to S/4HANA."
Cegid is ranked 16th in Cloud HCM with 12 reviews while SAP HCM is ranked 3rd in Cloud HCM with 48 reviews. Cegid is rated 7.2, while SAP HCM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cegid writes "Facilitates reusability, loads massive data, and creates reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Allows you to generate reports, easy integration and offers out-of-the-box support". Cegid is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, UKG, Workday and BambooHR, whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, ADP GlobalView Payroll and Sage People. See our Cegid vs. SAP HCM report.
See our list of best Cloud HCM vendors and best Talent Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud HCM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
