We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management and Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is notable for its extensive data protection, incident identification, and adaptable rule sets. It provides control over IAM roles, training options, and robust reporting. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration excels at API-driven integration and advanced prevention of data leaks. Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management could enhance its reporting, vulnerability assessments, integration, and customizability. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration requires improvements in integration, performance, and collaboration capabilities.
Service and Support: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management has been praised for its helpful support. Some Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration customers were dissatisfied with response times and requested support in more languages, but others said the support was excellent.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is quick and painless, and the overall deployment varies. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration has an automated setup that requires minimal user intervention.
Pricing: Some users found Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management to be reasonably priced and compatible, while others perceive it as costly. Reviewers had mostly good things to say about the cost of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration. Users describe the licensing as uncomplicated and budget-friendly.
ROI: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management offers benefits in terms of compliance management and decreased administrative workload. One user reported a 35% return on investment (ROI) and a notable growth rate. Reviewers also said that Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration consistently delivers a solid return. Users reported estimated ROIs ranging from 15% to 80%.
Comparison Results: Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is preferred over Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration. Users appreciate CloudGuard's comprehensive data security and protection for the entire cloud infrastructure. It offers strong incident detection, granular reporting, and the ability to customize rulesets based on compliance requirements. CloudGuard provides IAM role control and embedded machine learning for real-time attack prevention. Users find the dashboard intuitive, reporting powerful, and the product's ability to enhance security and resolve incidents impressive.
"It offers advanced detection of threats that can harm data from the cloud database."
"We like the ability to investigate, analyze, and generate reports."
"Auto remediation is a very effective feature that helps ensure less manual intervention."
"The two most valuable features for us are the central firewall administrator and the real-time cloud compliance monitoring."
"People implementing this solution are concerned with addressing a significant risk, and within the AWS realm, this tool does de-risk substantially."
"This platform has allowed us to collect data from multiple sources, centralizing everything under a single source."
"It provides complete visibility of workload hosted on different cloud platforms including AWS and Azure, along with multiple tenants."
"Dome9 has improved our organization; we have a centralized view of all of our assets, our visible assets our ECs, our inventories. And then all the policies are centralized, and it is easier to manage because everything is one component console."
"As a comprehensive solution, Check Point offers a very granular and best-in-class experience."
"It helped us to bring security compliance and ensure system robustness throughout."
"Its analysis or emulation in the review of each file using the cloud and Check Point helps make each interaction via email more secure."
"We are able to protect sensitive business data and maintain regulatory compliance with advanced data leak prevention (DLP)."
"Machine Learning and AI for email security have helped all the organization's members to guard their information against insecure exposure."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the phishing protection it offers."
"The dashboard provides information to investigate more about malicious activity and blocked emails."
"It is fast and has a very simple, easy integration."
"It should capture more information in metadata including communication detail. Also, Internal IP addresses should not be tracked as this might be having some compliance issues."
"The main issue that we found with Dome9 is that we have a default rule set with better recommendations that we want to use. So, you do a clone of that rule set, then you do some tweaks and customizations, but there is a problem. When they activate the default rule set with the recommendations and new security measures, it doesn't apply the new security measures to your clones profile. Therefore, you need to clone the profile again. We are already writing a report to Check Point."
"The reporting dashboard responds slowly, which leads to late report compilation."
"The performance can be better. Sometimes, the performance is not up to the mark. There is also integration complexity with third-party software and tools."
"Compliance checks on cloud resources against various industry standards and compliance framework templates need to be improved."
"The dashboard customization has room for improvement."
"I'd like to see more advanced encryption for local features, which is not present right now."
"The Check Point Infinity admin portal sometimes freezes."
"A signature-based filter could improve the solution's AI model for spam email."
"After updates, the internet connection fails, and I have to restart my desktop to resume initial functionalities."
"There are a few areas for improvement. One is the occasional sluggishness or latency, which is likely due to the cloud-based nature of the solution. So, the performance can be better."
"I would love it if they would do some work on the Postgres definition on the back-end."
"There is always room for improvement and growth."
"There is too much functionality, which makes it difficult to use. More guidance for users would be helpful."
"It's not fully integrated with Google Workspace, and the statistics don't update in real-time."
"Support can be a bit quicker in helping the customer."
More Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 63 reviews while Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is ranked 9th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 49 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration writes "Has a user-friendly dashboard, a great anti-phishing algorithm, and sandboxing for testing". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Avanan, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Mimecast Email Security and Cisco Secure Email. See our Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration report.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.