We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Network Security and Palo Alto Networks VM-Series based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewalls solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The flexibility and ease of configuration are the most valuable features."
"It is easy to use and performs very well."
"I really like the captive portal feature for our guest network. It has nice VLAN features in terms of separating our network. The anti-virus is also good."
"Customers are more inclined towards FortiGate because of application control, web filtering, and anti-spam features. The support from the FortiGate team is good, and price-wise, it is affordable."
"Its performance in fulfilling our requirements has been satisfactory."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiGate are the ease of use and the UI. It has always provided me with what I needed. I have no need for additional costs that other solutions have, such as Sophos."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"What's most important is the ease of use."
"It improves the availability of engineers to carry out projects."
"The central management feature is a big plus, allowing us to manage both local and cloud gateways from one platform."
"The most valuable feature is the centralized dashboard, which is used for managing all of the Check Point Security Gateways."
"The most valuable feature for me is that you have just one license. You can test and implement everything you need with one license. You do not need to pay for separate module licenses when you want IPS or other features."
"Identity awareness, URL filtering, IDS, DLP, Content Filtering, VPN, and Application Control are all excellent."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring. We can easily monitor what kind of stuff comes over to our network and we can then check the dashboard and work accordingly."
"Now, we can filter which websites users can access and block categories that are a risk. For example, we can block social media and gambling sites. This has helped to decrease the risk of access to malicious content on the internet."
"Auto Scaling is one of the features that make me want to choose CloudGuard over actual HW."
"The main advantage of Palo Alto Networks VM-Series stems from the fact that you can access it with the help of cloud services."
"The most valuable features are web control and IPS/IDS."
"In the newer version, there are 3850s, all of them are scalable. They fit better into the medium or small businesses."
"It has excellent scalability."
"In AWS, Palo Alto provides us a better view than flow logs for network traffic."
"What I like about the VM-Series is that you can launch them in a very short time."
"App-ID and User-ID have repeatedly shown value in securing business critical systems."
"A solid operating system with all the necessary data center security features."
"The solution could be more evenly structured."
"The user interface could be improved."
"It needs more available central management."
"The non-error conserve mode has room for improvement."
"Fortinet FortiGate could improve if it had a cloud-managed solution."
"The solution can have more features in a single box that can be multi-applied to integrate everything."
"The performance and speed are aspects of the solution that could always be improved upon."
"The solution lacks sufficient filtering."
"Check Point CloudGuard Network Security should give productive reports as per business requirements. It needs to improve support since the time-limit extended beyond a day. It should include more seamless API integrations."
"We miss full blade support for all blades that are compatible with the cluster. Especially notable is the lack of support for Identity Awareness in active standby environments for customers. In our setup, transitioning to Connective clusters would be preferable for maintaining connections during failover situations."
"CheckPoint CloudGuard could be better at solving cases."
"The migration to TerraForm is a little more complicated, but we made it work."
"CloudGuard Network Security could be improved in the area of upgrading in place."
"There is room for improvement, especially concerning the integration with the management center. It would be beneficial if tasks that currently require scripts could be performed directly from the GUI."
"In the next release, including VRF support would be highly beneficial."
"Some more built-in marketplace templates would be nice. It would be nice to see more vendor assistance in deployments and backup of recoveries versus having customers rely upon that themselves. That would make it a lot more seamless and aligned with the standard on-premise model that is there. Check Point can extend the same posture that they have to CloudGuard and make that transition very seamless."
"The implementation should be simplified."
"The interface is all Java-based. I would prefer an HTML5 interface."
"The web interface is very slow, and it needs to be faster."
"With Palo Alto Networks VM-Series, it is hard for me to manage its network configuration part."
"The solution needs to improve its visibility. It's not straightforward to use. Understanding the policies, authorizations, and initializing features requires careful review. The product needs to offer proper training."
"The product needs improvement in their Secure Access Service Edge."
"The utilization monitoring and GUI have room for improvement."
"Just sometimes it can be a bit sluggish navigating through pages. That is just purely because of Java."
More Check Point CloudGuard Network Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is ranked 8th in Firewalls with 121 reviews while Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is ranked 10th in Firewalls with 53 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is rated 8.6, while Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard Network Security writes "Highly reliable, great visibility, and centralized management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks VM-Series writes "Many features are optimized for troubleshooting real-time scenarios, saving a lot of time". Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is most compared with Azure Firewall, VMware NSX, Akamai Guardicore Segmentation, Cisco Secure Firewall and Illumio, whereas Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is most compared with Azure Firewall, Fortinet FortiGate-VM, Cisco Secure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and Netgate pfSense. See our Check Point CloudGuard Network Security vs. Palo Alto Networks VM-Series report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.