We performed a comparison between Checkmk and Veeam ONE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."
"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."
"I really like the auto-discovery feature."
"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."
"Veeam One is a centralized management and centralized reporting tool. The tool has supportive infrastructure to create specialised applications and some server application. You can add all the resources and infrastructure. You will get the reports, can easily manage and monitor any feature."
"The feature that we have found most valuable is its traffic plan. The traffic plan is very good."
"For me, the most important feature is alerting."
"The solution is really easy and straightforward to use."
"The solution offers a very straightforward setup."
"Veeam ONE is a very good management product...The technical support is very good, and I think it's one of the best. The response time is very quick."
"The product is very straightforward and very easy to use from the client-side."
"I like the tool's backup."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."
"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."
"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."
"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."
"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."
"Veeam ONE should make available notifications through SMS."
"The pricing is very high."
"In future releases, I would like to see more automation capabilities. It could integrate with automation services to automatically resolve identified issues rather than simply providing instructions to the user."
"The user experience can be better, as it is one of the areas with shortcomings in the product."
"Backup management features are crucial for ensuring the reliability and automation of backup processes."
"We'd like to see them add more custom templates."
"Sometimes, it's a little difficult for me to use its user interface. Its scope is very big with a lot of tuning, settings, and so on. If it's difficult for me, it must also be difficult for our customers."
"Perhaps the interface could be improved, though it has always been fine for me."
Checkmk is ranked 15th in Cloud Monitoring Software with 6 reviews while Veeam ONE is ranked 18th in Cloud Monitoring Software with 57 reviews. Checkmk is rated 8.6, while Veeam ONE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Checkmk writes "A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam ONE writes "A tool useful to monitor infrastructures and for backup purposes that needs to improve its deployment process". Checkmk is most compared with Zabbix, Icinga, Netdata, Centreon and OpenNMS , whereas Veeam ONE is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware Aria Operations, VMware vSphere, Zabbix and CloudPhysics. See our Checkmk vs. Veeam ONE report.
See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.