We performed a comparison between Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) and Splashtop Remote Support based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Access solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is that it supports team clients."
"For our company's customers, I feel that the product is stable."
"The installation and maintenance are good."
"The app protection feature is one of the most valuable because it provides good security, as nobody is going to be able to look into your screen while you are sharing the screen. And if someone has installed a keylogger in your system, your keystrokes will be jumbled up and they would not make any sense to the keylogger. App protection is one of the coolest security features that I have encountered on any platform."
"Citrix DaaS’s most valuable feature is the virtualization of applications and desktops."
"The product is stable."
"For the most part, overall stability is what you would expect."
"This is a very stable solution which you can feel confident using."
More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Pros →
"The tool's most valuable features are pricing and easy management."
"The ability to use mobile devices is helpful because we can support our clients from anywhere."
"The solution is very fast."
"The initial setup is simple."
"The cost of Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops is high and has room for improvement."
"The initial setup is complex."
"We have had issues with certain aspects, which is why we are looking for alternatives. For example, the firewall solution from Citrix is a bit complicated. Integration is hard."
"Templating the deployment process could use improvement. When you start, there are a large number of details that are quite client-specific, although they do share common themes. To get somebody up and running in a day is very difficult to do. They should streamline by use case."
"There have been many issues with stability."
"Tech support can be slow if you do not receive help from the US representatives."
"The initial setup is complex."
"There is room for improvement on the hypervisor side, providing better integration between the hypervisor and the product line. I suspect that they haven't put the work into that because of the move to the cloud. They want everything to be cloud-hosted. But for folks like us, who will always be a hybrid model, that's of some concern."
More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Cons →
"Splashtop Remote Support needs to improve customization."
"The packages that Splashtop has, tend to be a little bit confusing and should be simplified."
"The solution should add more options and tools for shortcuts, administration, etc."
"The integration features could be better."
More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is ranked 3rd in Remote Access with 92 reviews while Splashtop Remote Support is ranked 17th in Remote Access with 4 reviews. Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is rated 8.4, while Splashtop Remote Support is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) writes "Flexible Deployment, reliable performance, and fast transmission speeds". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splashtop Remote Support writes "Offers remote support and management is easy ". Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is most compared with Amazon Appstream, VMware Horizon View, Amazon WorkSpaces, Citrix Workspace and Apache Guacamole, whereas Splashtop Remote Support is most compared with Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, Parallels Access, Parsec and TeamViewer. See our Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs. Splashtop Remote Support report.
See our list of best Remote Access vendors.
We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
