We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Elastic Search based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The most valuable feature for us is the analytics that we can configure and view using Kibana."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its utility and usefulness."
"It gives us the possibility to store and query this data and also do this efficiently and securely and without delays."
"The flexibility and the support for diverse languages that it provides for searching the database are most valuable. We can use different languages to query the database."
"Elastic Enterprise Search is scalable. On a scale of one to 10, with one being not scalable and 10 being very scalable, I give Elastic Enterprise Search a 10."
"Search is really powerful."
"I appreciate that Elastic Enterprise Search is easy to use and that we have people on our team who are able to manage it effectively."
"We can easily collect all the data and view historical trends using the product. We can view the applications and identify the issues effectively."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"While integrating with tools like agents for ingesting data from sources like firewalls is valuable, I believe prioritizing improvements to the core product would be more beneficial."
"Performance improvement could come from skipping background refresh on search idle shards (which is already being addressed in the upcoming seventh version)."
"Elastic Search needs to improve its technical support. It should be customer-friendly and have good support."
"Improving machine learning capabilities would be beneficial."
"Could have more open source tools and testing."
"Elastic Search needs to improve authentication. It also needs to work on the Kibana visualization dashboard."
"It is hard to learn and understand because it is a very big platform. This is the main reason why we still have nothing in production. We have to learn some things before we get there."
"I would like to see more integration for the solution with different platforms."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Elastic Search is ranked 1st in Indexing and Search with 59 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Elastic Search is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic Search writes "Played a crucial role in enhancing our cybersecurity efforts ". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and Logz.io, whereas Elastic Search is most compared with Faiss, Milvus, Pinecone, Azure Search and Amazon Kendra.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.