We compared Huntress and CrowdStrike Falcon Complete based on our users reviews.
Our conclusion is that Huntress and CrowdStrike Falcon Complete have distinct strengths and weaknesses. Huntress is highly regarded for its expertise in identifying threats and its constant monitoring capabilities, supported by advanced AI. However, it falls short in terms of detailed reporting and compatibility with other antivirus solutions. On the other hand, CrowdStrike Falcon Complete provides a lightweight agent, vulnerability assessment, and robust threat intelligence. It also offers a comprehensive response to threats and user-friendly dashboards. Nevertheless, it lacks features such as application control and user risk scoring, and some users find the pricing to be high.
In summary, Huntress excels in proactive defense and threat hunting, while CrowdStrike Falcon Complete offers a comprehensive response to threats and strong threat intelligence.
We primarily focused on the topics below:
Ease of Deployment and Service and Support: The setup process for Huntress is simple and uncomplicated, with fast installation and minimal resource demands. Similarly, CrowdStrike Falcon Complete also offers a straightforward setup, although it may be more challenging for extensive networks lacking an automated ruling platform. Deployment times for CrowdStrike can vary from one day to one month, whereas Huntress only necessitates one person for deployment. Huntress' customer service is highly regarded for its quick and effective help, earning a flawless rating. On the other hand, CrowdStrike Falcon Complete's customer service receives varied feedback. Some customers appreciate its excellent support, while others express dissatisfaction with its slow response time and areas that require enhancement.
The summary above is based on 43 interviews we conducted with Huntress and CrowdStrike Falcon Complete users. To access the interviews' full transcripts, download our report.
"The most valuable feature is reviewing tickets and the notes added by technicians."
"The most valuable part of Binary Defense is its team of cybersecurity analysts. Their analysts filter out the noise and only forward the critical threats that require a response instead of false positives."
"Among the valuable features are the agent, continuous reporting, and dashboard. It has all the features we need and we haven't had to customize it, other than turning on certain features that we wanted."
"With Binary Defense, we don't just get an alert, but also a detailed rundown of why they're alerting us on it. They tell us what was executed, or the username, script, or IP. That way, we're not wasting time investigating."
"The biggest aspect for us is that they are able to conform to our environment and utilize our tools. That way, we still maintain ownership of all the data and access to the applications, and we never lose control of the ability to run the solution ourselves if we need to."
"The customization has been the most valuable aspect and was really the reason we ended up selecting Binary Defense. They worked with us to provide exactly the level of support, features, response, and collaboration we needed."
"Binary Defense has a human service department that provides live monitoring for our systems."
"The best part about Binary Defense MDR is that it runs on everything, and they keep an eye on things 24/7."
"What I found most valuable in CrowdStrike Falcon Complete is that it has a lot of monitoring dashboards and use cases, and I saw that it's a very good product, but my company has only tested it, so it's not been used for real use cases. My company hasn't tested the complete license for CrowdStrike Falcon Complete, so the team hasn't checked the open fiber rooms for zero-day attacks, IOAs and IOCs, or any indicators of fraudulent activities. I was also amazed at the solution and its licensing. My company did a competitive analysis of many EDR solutions, but it went with CrowdStrike Falcon Complete. It's one of the top-rated solutions on CyberRatings as well."
"Its machine learning and AI features are good."
"We have experienced ROI using this solution. The value is clear when you are able to stop a ransomware attack or other threats."
"It's not a signature-based solution, which is ideal for us."
"The most valuable feature is that it has a zero-day approach. It does not work with the signature itself. It looks into what is happening on an endpoint and protects you better against threats that are not yet known but are captured in a signature. It provides far better detection than when it is only signature-based. You get much quicker protection against any new threat. This is the most important feature of the CrowdStrike solution."
"Falcon Complete's best feature is detection. The interface is also user-friendly."
"Their intelligence is really good. The security whitepapers that they write are outstanding. They handle it all for the clients. CrowdStrike Complete is managed by CrowdStrike. They only call a client if there is a problem that they can't address. They pretty much contain and eradicate. This is not something that every vendor provides."
"The continuous improvement in detections and response times is valuable. They are more focused on threats that come from the cloud, not only that we see."
"Foothold detection is a valuable feature, acting as a valuable second set of eyes for both us and our clients."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."
"We don’t have the required staff to watch the issues that are happening. It is good to have a team from Huntress who can watch the logs 24/7. The tool’s automatic remediation is also fantastic. The solution’s interface is also nice and easy to use. The Huntress team saves us time by going through the issues."
"Huntress helps by highlighting potential issues, allowing us to take proactive measures."
"While threat hunting is undoubtedly the most valuable feature, the combination of IP scanning, foothold identification, and canary monitoring has also proven to be incredibly beneficial."
"It is very easy to use. It is a great solution. They are one of the better vendors that I have ever worked with since I have been in the industry."
"I have found it valuable that this solution is always there and always armed."
"It catches things that no one else catches. We occasionally have things slip through antivirus and other things, but Huntress catches them. It is awesome as an additional layer of defense on top of other things."
"We should be able to isolate devices faster. They should shorten the time between clicking on a device to contain it and carrying out the action. That would be a welcome improvement."
"I would like to see more frequent check-ins with our security status."
"I would like to get more reports from Binary Defense about what they're blocking."
"It's sometimes difficult to know when to engage Binary Defense or TrustedSec, their sister company. TrustedSec is more focused on offensive security, as opposed to the defensive security that the MDR solution provides. It would be awesome if there were a better bridge between that relationship for when we need to get more proactive services or when we need to do a penetration test."
"Binary Defense MDR could be even better with additional features, like automatic scans and file quarantine."
"The only area I see for improvement with Binary Defense is their service portal. It could benefit from some enhancements."
"The most significant area for improvement is in support for non-English speakers; we're a global organization, so many of our users are not English speakers, which can make interacting with them a challenge. There's no Chinese language support, so we must rely on what we can do with the internet. We don't expect Binary Defense to build a language staff, but details can get lost in translation when we assume the whole world speaks English."
"We found a couple of bugs in the user interface."
"Some dashboards can be very complex, but once you get to know them, it is very logical."
"I would love for the threat intelligence part to be more globalized to provide a tailored response to types of malware and ransomware that are trending in other regions. For example, they can add a feature to tell us that there are separate attacks in South Asia or East Asia occurring at these times, so we can supply those things to our environment and protect ourselves."
"Their UI is a bit noisy."
"Crowdstrike could be cheaper. It's pricier than Carbon Black."
"There have been some issues with Falcon Complete's performance."
"The customization could be tweaked. We can do a bunch of custom dashboards. However, the one thing that I'm not a fan of is when you go to do an investigation, the way that the processes are laid out on the screen is very bland looking. While the information is there, it could be laid out better."
"In a future release, it would be ideal if they could add reporting and action histories to their suite of features."
"When you enable a particular feature, it takes a long time, from 15 to 30 minutes, to implement in enterprise environments. This can be improved."
"I would like the API to be a little better. They are getting there."
"Some of Huntress' reporting could be improved."
"I'd like Huntress to implement a component that can analyze network traffic for specific sites."
"Huntress' Process Insights feature could benefit from more robust search and filtering capabilities."
"I am anxiously watching to see how they evolve their MDR for Office 365. If anything, I would like more automated remediation capabilities in their MDR for Office 365."
"We need an API to automatically retrieve metrics and data about backend activity so we can generate client reports."
"Their EDR can have increased coverage for Macintosh. They do not fully secure Macintosh computers."
"The application control system could benefit from improvements in identifying and managing both whitelisted and blacklisted applications."
CrowdStrike Falcon Complete is ranked 1st in Managed Detection and Response (MDR) with 75 reviews while Huntress is ranked 3rd in Managed Detection and Response (MDR) with 12 reviews. CrowdStrike Falcon Complete is rated 8.6, while Huntress is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of CrowdStrike Falcon Complete writes "Great next-generation antivirus with breach warranty and good intrusion protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huntress writes "Is the easiest tool we've ever deployed, is cost-effective, and significantly improved our security posture". CrowdStrike Falcon Complete is most compared with Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response, Blackpoint Cyber MDR, Secureworks Taegis ManagedXDR, Sophos MDR and SentinelOne Vigilance, whereas Huntress is most compared with SentinelOne Vigilance, Blackpoint Cyber MDR, Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response, Bitdefender MDR and Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). See our CrowdStrike Falcon Complete vs. Huntress report.
See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.
We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
