We performed a comparison between CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault and HashiCorp Vault based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the solution is session recording."
"Super stable and easy to scale"
"It's a highly flexible solution that can adapt to each customer's needs."
"The privileged support manager is the most valuable feature of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault."
"The password rotation and cyber gateway have been quite useful."
"Our privileged accounts are now stored in a more secure location and lateral movement within the network have been lessened."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"CyberArk is a good and adaptive solution. It is easy to adopt and install. It is easy for every use case."
"The most valuable feature of HashiCorp Vault is the management of tickets in the pipeline."
"It is an added value for our customers to have a Secrets Management workflow available that is PaaS/CaaS/KaaS Platform agnostic."
"The solution is stable. It has been working perfectly without any problem."
"It is user-friendly and easy to implement from any application point."
"The tool's dynamic rotation of the password credentials is good."
"The most valuable feature of HashiCorp Vault is that it's an open source solution. Second, it's cloud agnostic, so it's very easy to maintain and control, which is why we prefer HashiCorp."
"The feature I find most beneficial in HashiCorp Vault is the secret engine. It integrates smoothly with many applications, making it easy to set up and implement quickly. This allows you to test it easily and see good results rapidly. When you integrate an internal API or application, it quickly manages that application's secrets."
"It is a good product to consider for companies who are looking to build on-premise or hybrid infrastructure."
"The solution is too big and complex for any businesses that are small or medium-sized. They should offer a more compact version or make a solution better suited to smaller businesses."
"There are upwards of six components you need to set it up. And you might need anywhere from two to five servers. It takes some work to set that up, especially in a larger environment."
"The initial setup could be simplified. Right now, in comparison to its nearest competitors, it's quite complex."
"CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault's deployment is complex for resources with little experience. Tech support needs to be improved as well based on quality and knowledge."
"The tool needs to improve its usage and interface. They need to have a modern and useful interface. I want the product to improve its integration capabilities as well since some of the integration features do not work always."
"The only problem involves granting access to people who are authorized to view it."
"We should be able to join small components."
"The session monitoring and recording feature is also a good feature feature, but we're currently experiencing an issue with session monitoring not working correctly. We're working with CyberArk to resolve it. We aren't able to view active sessions or historical recordings of sessions."
"A drawback for some clients who have to be PCI compliant is that they still need to use and subscribe to an HSM (Hardware Security Module) solution."
"It would be helpful to have more advanced features."
"We could use more documentation, primarily to do with integrations."
"In terms of features, the only thing that I found a little bit hinky was that there was no revocation or deletion on the model we were using. Once in a financial year, a client interacts, and you pay for that client for the year. So, there are just little things like that in the pricing. There should be more clarity around the end of the key. I know there is no system like this. They all are the same. I tested Microsoft, Google, and some others, and none of them really want you to delete a key, which makes sense. You delete a key, and you lose everything that it has wrapped or encrypted, but it's actually just a language. Deletion isn't really deletion. It's really revocation, but overall, HashiCorp Vault ticked all the boxes for us, and I couldn't fault it."
"The solution could be much easier to implement."
"I would like to see better integration of HashiCorp Vault with SAP products."
"I would rate the stability a six out of ten. There are some bugs and glitches. We are in touch with the vendor to resolve them."
"I don't think there are any major improvements required—so far, so good. However, I think that having more training materials, such as videos, and documentation available would be helpful. I would prefer to have more videos available either on the official site or on YouTube."
More CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is ranked 4th in Enterprise Password Managers with 48 reviews while HashiCorp Vault is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Password Managers with 16 reviews. CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is rated 8.4, while HashiCorp Vault is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault writes "Helps to store system accounts ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HashiCorp Vault writes "Useful for machine-to-machine communication and has secret engine feature ". CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Delinea Secret Server, BeyondTrust Password Safe and LastPass, whereas HashiCorp Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Keeper, Delinea Secret Server and BeyondTrust Password Safe. See our CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault vs. HashiCorp Vault report.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
