We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and Microsoft BitLocker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Ping Identity and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients."
"The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."
"I found the solution to be stable."
"The initial setup of CyberArk Identity was straightforward."
"It has machine learning and can help clients to learn the environment and understand what is happening."
"The tool is a very strong and valuable enterprise solution, particularly in ensuring the continuity of service."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Identity are its ability to control access to administrative staff."
"If anyone makes an error, or if an incident occurs by accident, the business will not be harmed as a result of this activity."
"You can do a silent remote deployment very fast."
"There's a lot of manageability within the solution. This is very helpful."
"The most valuable feature is the authentication process which is very fast."
"It's my understanding that the initial setup is straightforward."
"The ease of administering and integrating the solution is great."
"The most valuable feature is the TPM (Trusted Platform Module), which makes the PC security stronger because somebody who is not from the team cannot access the PC without the decryption PIN."
"I like the simplicity and ease of use of this solution."
"It is easy to use. It is usually easy to recover someone's privacy. The manageability is much easier than McAfee. I think that Microsoft is a leader in this area. We are in the Microsoft school so our judgment of McAfee will be a little bit unfair as we recommend Microsoft all the time because of the easy manageability and support. I think that McAfee is designed for a different customer and every time we open a ticket with their support, it takes a very, very long time. The main difference is just the manageability and support. In terms of the solution itself or the functionality, I know that McAfee is very strong, but manageability and support, for us, is much more important. It's strengthens the solution for us."
"The product is not cheap, especially if you opt for an on-premise deployment requiring a complex server infrastructure. On the other hand, choosing the software as a service version simplifies infrastructure requirements but necessitates being online all the time."
"There is room for improvement in documentation. The documentation could be more specific about the changes needed to achieve specific goals."
"In terms of a governance platform, it's worth noting that CyberArk doesn't offer a particularly strong one."
"More integrations would be better."
"They could improve their UI and make everything more user-friendly."
"The OpenID features could improve in CyberArk Identity."
"The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The encryption takes a long time to complete, and our system runs very slowly while it is encrypting."
"The people at the first level of support refer you to articles that do not pertain to the problem at hand."
"It needs a management console."
"It's possible that the time it takes to pull items in to BitLocker could be reduced a bit."
"The only thing that could be slightly improved is the occasional stability issue."
"Microsoft BitLocker needs to be an all-inclusive solution. For example, a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) cryptoprocessor is required to use Bitlocker with your computer which keeps Bitlocker from adoption beyond Windows."
"The solution could improve by having a centralized GUI for management."
"The deployment process regarding prerequisites and automation could be easy to understand."
CyberArk Identity is ranked 10th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 18 reviews while Microsoft BitLocker is ranked 1st in Endpoint Encryption with 61 reviews. CyberArk Identity is rated 8.2, while Microsoft BitLocker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "Allows Linux and Unix administrators to login with single password ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft BitLocker writes "A solution that prevents unauthorized access and goes beyond security measures to provide protection to its users". CyberArk Identity is most compared with Microsoft Intune, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity Platform and Okta Workforce Identity, whereas Microsoft BitLocker is most compared with ESET Endpoint Encryption, Symantec Endpoint Encryption, McAfee Complete Data Protection, Trend Micro Endpoint Encryption and Wave Systems Safend Data Protection Suite.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.