We performed a comparison between Epicor iScala and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."The accounting, purchasing, and basic ERP functions work well. But they are a little bit older, but they work for us. The inventory management is good and necessary for any company that manages stock for production or services."
"We use Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central as CRM."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV is brilliant and it's a different segment when comparing it with Dynamics AX. Dynamics AX is a larger product with much more features and it's aimed at a different segment of the market."
"The solution's integrations and interface are very good."
"Microsoft Dynamic 365 has everything we need, like Teams, Outlook, Excel, etc. I do a lot of data visualization, so I work a lot with Power BI. I bring in tables from Oracle and use Power Bi to manipulate and visualize the data. I handle all the stats and track everything that goes in and out of the company. We use all the modules, but I work primarily with Power BI, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Teams. They are all equally important and work together."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV is good for smaller-sized companies."
"Has good integration with Power BI."
"The solution makes everything organized for my organization or enterprise. It makes workflows more than clear."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is the Teams application. I use Teams to share documents amongst my team members, have meetings, and talk to them."
"We're facing challenges with iScala in the public sector, specifically healthcare. The system doesn't have sufficient support for the complexities of managing payments for doctors, nurses, and other healthcare staff."
"There is room for improvement in terms of compatibility."
"I think Microsoft should improve on the process of how the user decides on a business workflow. For example, there may be some kind of drag-and-drop interface that lets us decide for ourselves how to develop the business workflows that fit our purpose."
"Customization and costs could be improved."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV could improve the reporting."
"Its task scheduling and manufacturing models need improvement."
"The solution is stable, but it could improve."
"The performance and virtual machine backup is not good with this solution and need improvements."
"I wouldn't say that Microsoft Dynamics is very scalable."
More Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
Epicor iScala is ranked 25th in ERP with 1 review while Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is ranked 3rd in ERP with 62 reviews. Epicor iScala is rated 6.0, while Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Epicor iScala writes "Offers inventory management, basic ERP functions but outdated interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central writes "Easy to deploy, extremely stable, and highly scalable". Epicor iScala is most compared with Epicor ERP and SAP Business One, whereas Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central is most compared with SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics AX, SAP Business One, SAP ERP and Odoo.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.