We performed a comparison between ERPNext and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the product's initial setup a nine on a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy."
"The Fiori design is a valuable feature."
"SAP S/4HANA is the preferred database because of its scalability, faster accessibility, compatibility, and other well-suited features for large data sets."
"I have found the most valuable features are the interface, which is very good for all users, and the database performance is good."
"The solution is flexible, has a lot of functionality, and has the ability to deliver more security than other comparable solutions."
"I have been using SAP for more than 13 years and the new SAP S4HANA was not only a simple upgrade, they have made a lot of improvements. They have simplified a lot of the functions, the all-new interface gives users a better experience. The database itself is quite efficient in nature and it provides effective data queries. It is a good upgrade from the previous version of SAP R/3."
"One of the things I like about it is its well-integrated and secure nature."
"The initial setup is not complex; it's more at a medium level. Not too easy, but with the right knowledge, you can configure it."
"SAP S4HANA has good performance and has allowed us to combine our systems."
"The look, feel, and color are areas in ERPNext that can be improved."
"We are always looking for a better user experience. We would like to see more consolidation in SAP S4HANA because of all the financial compliance and regulatory changes."
"I have found the solution to be stable but it could improve."
"I'm not a big fan of SAP S/4HANA because it needs a lot of hardware. It is really fast, but it needs a lot of hardware. The hardware for S/4HANA is too expensive."
"So, there is room for improvement in pricing. HANA is not a simple product; it's quite complex by design."
"The integration could be made a little simpler in terms of design and implementation."
"During parallel preparation of go-live processes, SAP B1 and S4H transactional data alignment can be difficult to track."
"Thi solution can improve the Bill of Materials (BOM) and production planning."
"While the solution contemplates a competitively priced model, its pricing could be cheaper."
ERPNext is ranked 31st in ERP with 1 review while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 75 reviews. ERPNext is rated 0.0, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ERPNext writes "An affordable tool that offers many useful and better modules than its competitors, along with great stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". ERPNext is most compared with SAP Business One, Tactive Construction Management Software, SAP ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Microsoft Dynamics AX, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.