We performed a comparison between GitHub and Liquibase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has been stable for us."
"The deployment is fast since we just have to run the script, and once it's done, it takes a few minutes."
"Has great integration with third-party tools."
"We use GitHub as a repository."
"I like the CI/CD features."
"The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code."
"The most valuable features are GitHub are the standard features, they are very useful."
"GitHub allows us the option to push files from a non-UA method or directly upload files from the UA. You can integrate GitHub with Jenkins to do CI/CD."
"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."
"It will be useful for teams to automate and reduce manual work."
"The solution is easy to use, and it has very clear documentation."
"The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."
"There can be conflict issues when two developers work on the same file or line of code, and it would be great to see that improved, possibly with an AI solution."
"It would be better if the amount of storage were increased."
"I cannot recall coming across any shortcomings of the product."
"The security point should be addressed in the next release and scaling is also an issue."
"The solution could have better support for the Markdown language."
"While using the solution when merging two code branches the code becomes a bit messy. This should be improved in the future."
"The stability can be improved."
"We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue."
"The pricing is quite high."
"One thing we faced issues with is that Liquibase does not show the exact error, which added to the complexity."
Earn 20 points
GitHub is ranked 3rd in Version Control with 74 reviews while Liquibase is ranked 7th in Version Control with 3 reviews. GitHub is rated 8.6, while Liquibase is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Liquibase writes "Offers integration with multiple databases, stable product and reduced our manual intervention". GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Fortify on Demand, Bitbucket and Atlassian SourceTree, whereas Liquibase is most compared with Bitbucket, Git and DBmaestro Database Source Control. See our GitHub vs. Liquibase report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
