We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and GitHub based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"This solution is very easy to use which I like about it. The capacity to own artifacts and share them with others is another good feature. You don't have to write all your code from scratch, you can use available templates and alter the code according to your needs."
"The most valuable features are GitHub are the standard features, they are very useful."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it can support you for most of the road map and it can automate some tasks which works really well with collaboration with the teams. They are really interested in how they organize the history of the code itself which is good."
"The ease of use is valuable."
"GitHub's merging feature is much better than that of other products because merging is done daily."
"We use GitHub instead of our regular shared drive. It offers instant access to shared folders as well as good security."
"The most valuable feature is the source code management. It's very helpful and it's a great product."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the version control field."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"Our firewall was blocking cloning and downloading with SSH."
"The GitHub repository needs an upgraded user interface and overall UI improvements."
"Scalability is an area with a shortcoming, because of which it has room for improvement."
"If something has to be moved into approvals, and if they don't approve it in a few hours, then they should move the approval request to some other user, or they should have a way to escalate it."
"The product must document the CI/CD process more."
"I would like to see more security where a plugin was available for us to update in relation to security."
"The stability can be improved."
"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while GitHub is ranked 3rd in Version Control with 71 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while GitHub is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Git, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit, whereas GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, Fortify on Demand and Checkmarx One. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. GitHub report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
