We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and Oracle Cloud Platform based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Google Cloud slightly nudges ahead of Oracle Cloud Platform in this comparison. Google Cloud is very flexible, user friendly, and widely acknowledged. Users feel Oracle Cloud Platform is lacking some basic features and currently offers a very small portfolio.
"What I like about this program, is that it's quite fast, because you pay for your usage."
"Google Cloud Storage is fast, and it's scalable."
"What I like most about Google Cloud Storage is that it's very stable, very quick, and very useful."
"It is easy to use."
"The most valuable features are stability and ease of use."
"It is seamlessly integrated with your Android. There’s no fuss, no hassle."
"It's simple to use."
"You do not need to install anything."
"It was quick to synchronize back from Azure to the on-premise server."
"It helps us with geo-redundancy."
"The security features and the ease of integration are good."
"It is a scalable product since it is a cloud solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The storage in this solution is excellent."
"The functionality is easy."
"The solution is easy to use."
"It is a very scalable solution. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten."
"The solution should have two factor authentication."
"An area for improvement is that when you share with others, they can see all your folders instead of just those you share. Only the folders you specifically share should be visible."
"Having more storage space would be an improvement."
"This solution could be improved by increasing integration with other tools, like Microsoft."
"When compared to one of its competitors, Google Cloud Storage does not have or offer a lot of services to its users. So, this is one of the downsides of the solution."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"It would be helpful to offer more packages to increase the storage."
"I would also like to be able to use my own tools and packages within this solution and also have a tool to visualize the data with graphics."
"Microsoft Azure File Storage is not that scalable. Once you reach the boundaries, you need to migrate to another solution."
"There is room for improvement in helping customers understand and integrate Azure File Storage into their operations."
"The initial setup is complex. Unless you have done it a few times it, it is going to be hard."
"They should make the solution more user-friendly."
"In our use cases, we see the weakness in mobile internet connectivity."
"The way retention policies are applied could be more optimized."
"Azure File Storage's stability is okay, but sometimes we have trouble with the link to the Azure VPN disconnecting."
"Licensing costs are expensive."
Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 66 reviews while Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 44 reviews. Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8, while Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Google Workspace and Amazon S3, whereas Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Wasabi, Amazon S3 and Oracle Database Backup Service. See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
