We performed a comparison between Oracle Service Bus and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I found most valuable in Oracle Service Bus is its time to market. It's excellent."
"The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered."
"The communication between applications is already defined, which means that you don't have to redefine your service infrastructure at the lower level."
"Monitoring feature that allows tracking of the web's UI development."
"I am a part of the software developing team and I mainly use this solution for the integrating applications."
"Supports multiple protocol technologies and web services."
"It is stable."
"With Oracle Service Bus, we can connect with different types of systems. Another feature I like the most is the security feature."
"The GUI and IDE features of this solution are easy to work with and to develop. We find application management easy using this solution. It is a stable product"
"It's very stable and reliable."
"The solution is very stable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance is robust."
"It is easy to develop. It has a very wide range of features. The older versions are very stable, and there are no issues with the product."
"The most valuable feature is that it is a service-oriented architecture, SOA-based."
"The technology is really easy to learn."
"TIBCO has the platform in terms of speed and ease of use."
"The pricing of the product could be better. It's a bit high."
"The weak point of OSB is the single point of failure."
"The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources."
"There are some loopholes in service and support."
"An area for improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the roadmap for its product launch. Currently, it's unclear, so Oracle should develop a roadmap for version 12c, so people can see what's coming out of that version of Oracle Service Bus. Cloud hosting is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Oracle Service Bus."
"Lacks sufficient cloud compatibility."
"It's very complex and hard to learn. There's a steep learning curve."
"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."
"The solution is very expensive when you use multiple components, it would b better if this could be reduced."
"I don't like the product's API management platform, as it doesn't offer users enough functionality to help with API lifecycle management, making it a product that is way behind its competitors."
"In the configuration, where we need to customize, it takes more time that we expect it to, ideally."
"We'd like to see improvements in product support."
"Migration to cloud solutions or products should be made convenient, transparent, and easily understandable."
"If TIBCO could be able to sort the size of their base image in the Container edition, it would be really marvelous. Right now it's around 299 MB. We'd really want it to reduce to a few MBs."
"In the next release, there should be improvements made to the API manager."
"The initial setup process could be easier."
More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Service Bus is ranked 6th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is ranked 9th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 12 reviews. Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus writes "A robust product that needs to improve the functionality it offers related to API lifecycle management". Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and IBM DataPower Gateway, whereas TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Mule ESB, Red Hat Fuse and IBM DataPower Gateway. See our Oracle Service Bus vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
