We performed a comparison between Oracle Service Bus and Red Hat Fuse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Overall it is a pretty good solution."
"The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered."
"What I like most about Oracle Service Bus is that you can use it for many integrations. For example, you can use it for on-premises to on-premises integrations, on-premises to cloud integrations, and cloud to on-premises integrations."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It's very easy to use. It's no code/low code. Oracle Middleware products are also rich in adapters."
"The routing and aggregation are the most valuable features. It's split and join."
"It is lightweight and one can easily integrate with different applications, databases, JMS, or web services through different protocols."
"There are always continuous improvements that are happening."
"The most valuable feature is the adapters."
"More than a feature, I would say that the reliability of the platform is the most valuable aspect."
"It's very lightweight. There's no need for any specialized tools in order to deploy any service for Red Hat Fuse."
"The solution has more tooling and options."
"Red Hat Fuse's best features are that it's very easy to set up and maintain."
"The stability has been good."
"This solution's adaptability to our use case has helped us integrate our systems seamlessly."
"The initial setup process is quite straightforward."
"We use it because it is easy to integrate with any other application...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution nine out of ten."
"An area for improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the roadmap for its product launch. Currently, it's unclear, so Oracle should develop a roadmap for version 12c, so people can see what's coming out of that version of Oracle Service Bus. Cloud hosting is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Oracle Service Bus."
"It needs to support more adapters, because the integration points keep changing and new things keep coming up. It also needs to be more scalable."
"There is significant room for improvement in the monitoring capabilities."
"It's very complex and hard to learn. There's a steep learning curve."
"Security needs to be more integrated."
"The inconvenient part about working with this product is that it's very heavy, requiring a lot of people and a lot of resources."
"If they can containerize this, that would be nice. If they can provide docker images and offer support for those containers, that would be great."
"It would be ideal if they could optimize it a bit."
"As its learning curve is quite steep, developer dependency will always be there in the case of a Red Hat Fuse development. This should be improved for developers. There should be some built-in connectors so the grind of the developer can be reduced."
"The stability of the solution is an area with a shortcoming that needs to be improved."
"What could be improved in Red Hat Fuse is the deployment process because it's still very heavy. It's containerized, but now with Spring Boot and other microservices-related containers, deployment is still very heavy. Red Hat Fuse still has room for improvement in terms of becoming more containerized and more oriented."
"Red Hat is not easy to learn. You can learn it but you sometimes need external expertise to implement solutions."
"I would like to see more up-to-date documentation and examples from Red Hat Fuse."
"In the next release, I'd like more stability and more security overall."
"The documentation for Fuse can be improved because, while it is very detailed and extensive, it is not too intuitive for someone that has to deliver some kind of troubleshooting services. In particular, for installation, re-installation, or upgrades, I find that the documentation can be improved."
"While it's a good platform, the pricing is a bit high."
Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews while Red Hat Fuse is ranked 4th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 23 reviews. Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8, while Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing feature, but its development features need improvement". Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus, whereas Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, webMethods Integration Server and JBoss ESB. See our Oracle Service Bus vs. Red Hat Fuse report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.