We performed a comparison between IBM MaaS360 and ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."Autopilot is the most valuable feature."
"It is very easy to use. It has a very easy interface."
"The ability to (somewhat) manage full Windows 10 computers including EXE-based or MSI-based application deployments using Azure Active Directory as Identity."
"The ability to block and erase remote devices is valuable to us, especially when those devices are lost."
"I can see that the patch management process is much improved with the bundled patch management option available in Microsoft Intune compared to the KPI deployment required by the other deployment solutions."
"The reporting and analytics features in Microsoft Intune have been a lifesaver."
"It works well if you have a Microsoft environment."
"There are so many features, but Windows Autopilot is one of the features that are very valuable for most customers."
"The implementation phase of IBM MaaS360 was pretty easy."
"We introduced the product as part of the SOC-2 requirement. The tool's most valuable features include keeping the operating system updated, tracking software inventory, controlling computer administrators, and the ability to wipe a computer in case of a security threat. It helps us to be compliant, and it is one of the reasons we implemented it."
"The most valuable features of IBM MaaS360 are encryption and mobile design."
"All features that we have deployed are useful. We do access office emails on our smartphones, and we have complete sync with Active Directory. Our calendar also gets synced in the MaaS360 application. We also ensure that the data from these official applications is not being misused by any of the employees. We have disabled cut, copy, paste, and all such features. It ensures that all the official data that our employees have on their smartphones is secure. Security is the paramount feature that we value in this product."
"One valuable feature is the ability to provide a secure environment. Another is the kiosk mode where MaaS360 can be used over a tablet or mobile device to ensure that a single application is used."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"It helped us reduce the number of support incidents by limiting users' access to device configurations."
"Maas360 uses distribution groups to deploy apps, which makes it a bit easier than, for example, Intune."
"Can manage a large fleet of devices without any outside interference."
"Microsoft Intune lacks the ability to provide seamless remote assistance or remote control."
"The initial setup is a little bit complex."
"The most important thing is reporting. They should improve their reporting. They should give a free hand to users. In SCCM, I can create my own reports. For example, in SCCM, I can create an inventory report for my PC or for all PCs, but in Intune, we don't have an option to create any report. Microsoft claims that Intune is a successor of SCCM, but SCCM is more powerful than Intune. So, they should develop Intune more and make it equivalent to SCCM. Then, their product will be great in the market."
"It would be great to see on-premises mailboxes and for the solution to have geofencing capabilities."
"Lacks the ability to deploy more ways of management, managing devices and processing the policies."
"Microsoft Intune has a latency response time issue. The latency has room for improvement."
"Microsoft Intune's support for Mac devices is lacking and could be improved."
"It needs incorporation of Knox, ZeroTouch, etc."
"The solution needs to offer live technical support. Right now, it's just a chat window and it's rather unhelpful."
"IBM MaaS360’s threat management feature needs improvement. It could identify even more malicious attacks."
"Configuring policies is difficult in IBM MaaS360. It also needs to improve usability."
"IBM MaaS360 needs to have stronger points when it comes to the area of BYOD."
"The interface is clunky and the layout is a bit outdated. Also, I don't think MaaS360 has as many features as Intune. It doesn't integrate with Office as seamlessly as Intune does, which isn't surprising, given that Intune and Office are Microsoft products."
"The user interface could definitely use some improvement."
"The look needs to be updated and it could be simpler to use."
"Can be added process of export/import environment configuration to simplify any migration processes."
"Lacks a factory reset feature."
IBM MaaS360 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 34 reviews while ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is ranked 11th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review. IBM MaaS360 is rated 7.8, while ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of IBM MaaS360 writes "It lets you separate work and personal data on mobile phones, but the interface is outdated and clunky". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus writes "Great features with very good function management". IBM MaaS360 is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, SOTI MobiControl, Jamf Pro, IBM MobileFirst and JumpCloud, whereas ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is most compared with ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Google Endpoint Management, VMware Workspace ONE and SOTI MobiControl.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.