We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo and Oracle Enterprise Asset Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Oracle and others in Enterprise Asset Management."The most valuable feature is the ability to correct maintenance."
"It can be particularly useful for power line operations, enabling linemen in the field to gather information and send it across the country as well as different parts of the world."
"We are very thankful to have IBM integrated with our own Legacy cloud-based system"
"The incident management feature is good because it allows you to keep track of and classify issues."
"We were doing all kinds of paperwork for every type of order and to maintain our assets but with the use of the IBM Maximo application, we can automate a lot of the processes."
"There are not many enterprise asset management systems on the market and not many that have the categories that IBM Maximo has."
"It is configurable, where you can add extra fields to screens and to the database."
"The most valuable features are the ability to create work orders and preventative maintenance."
"The whole product is important and valuable to us."
"Revision management of file attachments."
"Areas for improvement include: an enhanced Service Catalog on Mobile; Agent intelligence; better dashboards for KPIs."
"The solution is not stable. We can have one day when it is stable and another day it is not. Sometimes it crashes or becomes very slow, and there are times we are not even able to download all the databases. Without the database, we cannot work on that application. These are the small glitches, and stability issues we are facing."
"Although you can create notifications with Maximo, the configuration and options could be improved."
"Could use some alignment regarding some standards and the tracking of the IT assets. Even though they have all of the information (i.e. where are the assets, who owns the asset, etc.), they were not mapping it to different cyber standards."
"The pricing model of the solution has room for improvement as well as the after-sales support."
"Vendor management needs enhancement."
"The interface is not very easy or user-friendly and is in need of improvement."
"The product is not user-friendly."
More Oracle Enterprise Asset Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management with 23 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Asset Management with 1 review. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Asset Management writes "The product is not user-friendly, and it is very expensive, though it is highly stable". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM, IFS Cloud Platform and Coupa Invoice, whereas Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is most compared with ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM and Infor CloudSuite EAM.
See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.