We performed a comparison between IBM MQ and VMware Tanzu Data Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, VMware and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software."The product helps us monitor messages with other queues, view duplicated messages and control undelivered messages."
"The most valuable feature of IBM MQ is transaction processing."
"The most valuable feature is that it's a very strong integration platform but it is quite a monolithic solution. It's got everything."
"The system integration is good."
"The thing that I like about MQ most is its reliability. It's one of those types of products that just works. You don't have to tinker around with it too much."
"Secure, safe, and very fast."
"The reliability of the queuing is the most valuable feature."
"IBM MQ is the right choice because of the stability and the performance. And from the support perspective, it's enough to have a really small team."
"The product has been stable and I have never faced any kind of problems with it."
"The security is great."
"It's super easy to deploy and it also supports different languages and analytics."
"Scalable (Massive) Parallel Processing (MPP) – The ability to bring to bear large amounts of compute against large data sets with Greenplum and the EMC DCA has proven itself to be very effective."
"The solution is stable."
"Reliability for the messages is key. RabbitMQ ensures your messages are safe. They are not deleted and stuff."
"After creating a RabbitMQ service, they provide you with a sort of web management dashboard."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."
"IBM HQ's scalability isn't the best."
"The GUI part could be better."
"The memory management is very poor and it consumes too much memory."
"I believe there is too much code to be done in order to handle the elements that you develop."
"It could provide more monitoring tools and some improvement to the UI. I would also like to see more throughput in future versions."
"The pricing needs improvement."
"We need to have a better administration console and better monitoring features. Right now, they are not good and could be a lot better."
"Customer support response times could be improved."
"The availability could be better."
"The next release should include some of the flexibility and features that Kafka offers."
"There are some security concerns that have been raised with this product."
"Extra filters would be helpful."
"they need to interact more with customers. They need to explain the features, especially when there are new releases of Greenplum. I know just from information I've found that it has other features, it can be used to for analytics, for integration with Big Data, Hadoop. They need to focus on this part with the customer."
"VMware RabbitMQ's configuration process could be easier to understand."
"If messages pile up until the space of the memory is full, then basically, the cluster goes down, and someone has to log in through the backend and purge all messages."
"If you have a user consuming a huge load of resources, it takes down the entire system."
IBM MQ is ranked 2nd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 158 reviews while VMware Tanzu Data Services is ranked 4th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 81 reviews. IBM MQ is rated 8.4, while VMware Tanzu Data Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM MQ writes "Offers the ability to batch metadata transfers between systems that support MQ as the communication method". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Data Services writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". IBM MQ is most compared with ActiveMQ, Apache Kafka, Red Hat AMQ, PubSub+ Event Broker and Amazon SQS, whereas VMware Tanzu Data Services is most compared with Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ, ActiveMQ, Red Hat AMQ and Oracle Exadata.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
