We performed a comparison between Imprivata OneSign and Microsoft Entra ID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."
"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."
"Many of its features are valuable, including: facilitating application authentication, privileged access management, processes for attestation, and access reviews."
"I like the way it communicates to the cloud."
"It has made our work easier in that it’s simplified everything for us."
"We have about 80 users in the Azure Active Directory right now, however, we know that if it was necessary to scale it for hundreds or thousands of users, it wouldn't be a problem."
"It enhances security, especially for unregistered devices. It 1000% has security features that help to improve our security posture. It could be irritating at times, but improving the security posture is exactly what the Authenticator app does."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to set up conditional access, where you can enforce users to connect using multifactor authentication."
"Entra ID can be deployed using a hybrid model for organizations with a significant on-premises presence, or in a fully cloud-based setup for those that do not."
"The security and infrastructure management features are the most valuable ones for us."
"They should have a landing page."
"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"If your organization requires additional security then the subscription will be more expensive."
"Azure AD needs to be more in sync. The synchronization can be time-consuming."
"Better integration with external governance products would be a welcome addition to Azure AD."
"I would like to see improvements made when it comes to viewing audit logs, sign-in logs, and resource tags."
"The product could be more cost-effective."
"The licensing cost is a bit prohibitive."
"I rate Microsoft support five out of 10. It's just okay."
Imprivata OneSign is ranked 12th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews while Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 190 reviews. Imprivata OneSign is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Imprivata OneSign writes "Reasonably priced, performs well, easy to deploy, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Saves us time and money and features Conditional Access policies, SSPR, and MFA". Imprivata OneSign is most compared with Evidian Enterprise SSO, Keeper, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Okta Workforce Identity and Ping Identity Platform, whereas Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Ping Identity Platform and Okta Workforce Identity. See our Imprivata OneSign vs. Microsoft Entra ID report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.