We performed a comparison between Imprivata OneSign and Okta Workforce Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."
"It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."
"The most valuable feature in Okta Workforce Identity is the single sign-on, universal directory, and lifecycle management."
"Having a single sign-on to all our applications."
"The most valuable features are ease of operation and visibility."
"A solution that's easy to use, stable, and reliable."
"It's reliable and it does what it is advertised to do."
"The support for YubiKey is really good because you don't actually have to type in your username and password."
"I find the provisioning features and the integration with other applications useful."
"Workforce Identity offers a comprehensive access management solution with multi-factor authentication, total control, and features like app access management, identity governance, and administration tools such as certification and access request management. These are typically found in identity management solutions, but Okta integrates them seamlessly into its user interface."
"They should have a landing page."
"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."
"The only area of concern in the solution stems from the fact that my company needs some help regarding the setup phase from a partner."
"In some setup cases, there are issues with attributes not going in properly."
"UD attribute mapping, Okta group rules, and dynamic usage could use improvement. It also needs more in-depth functionality and features to integrate with RADIUS solutions."
"You can't hide the device when you're checking logs."
"The product is expensive compared to other tools."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The guest user access could be improved."
"On the admin side, we can create our own passwords instead of generating one, which is usually difficult to explain to a user."
Imprivata OneSign is ranked 12th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 59 reviews. Imprivata OneSign is rated 9.0, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Imprivata OneSign writes "Reasonably priced, performs well, easy to deploy, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Imprivata OneSign is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Evidian Enterprise SSO, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Keeper and Auth0, whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0. See our Imprivata OneSign vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.