We performed a comparison between Iron Mountain Connect and Rubrik based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"When it comes to saving time managing our backups, Rubrik has saved us a lot of time compared to what we were using. It feels like it has saved us lifetimes of time because the process used to be difficult. It's not just the day to time savings. When something goes wrong, that's where the real time savings comes into play. We are able to get back to where we need to be more confidently and with much fewer steps."
"Rubrik can also serve as a secondary host for emergency recoveries."
"Instant recovery because it takes about 10 seconds to restore the VM from backup to production"
"Rubrik has made the process to manage backup and recovery painless. This frees up more time to work on other projects."
"It has a good interface which is simple to navigate and utilize."
"Rubrik is very simple to implement and setup. "
"Rubrik is cheap, and you get good performance."
"The archiving, off-of-box, is awesome. It lets you put your data where you want it and gives you the peace of mind of having more than one copy of it. And it's smart about the way that it does the archiving. It doesn't just copy one-for-one. It does all of its processing of the deduplication and compression before it sends it off to the archive, which helps with our cloud costs."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
"I would like to see Rubrik better integrate with Microsoft Active Directory. Instead of just backing up a full domain controller, I would like the solution to have Active Directory object knowledge so we can restore specific objects in Active Directory versus restoring the whole domain controller."
"Global management of multiple systems is lacking, as is reporting across multiple installed units."
"Setup is immediate but pricing is not cheap."
"The dashboard and user interface could be improved to make them more user-friendly."
"Improving PowerShell integration would greatly simplify Rubrik management."
"Its cost is high."
"It is already very well furnished, but live mounts for Nutanix AHV would be amazing."
"The web interface could benefit from some improvement, particularly in terms of alerting and dashboard clarity. The cloud web interface is somewhat confusing and could use more development attention. Additionally, it's essential to ensure that local on-premise management options remain available alongside cloud-based solutions, as internet availability can affect backup management. Regarding features, cross-hypervisor restore functionality would be a valuable addition, allowing for greater flexibility in restoring VMs across different environments."
Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 39th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews while Rubrik is ranked 4th in Backup and Recovery with 83 reviews. Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6, while Rubrik is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik writes "Easy to use with minimal training required, innovative, good support". Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, NAKIVO Backup & Replication and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas Rubrik is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault Cloud, Zerto and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain). See our Iron Mountain Connect vs. Rubrik report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.