We performed a comparison between Juniper vSRX and Trend Micro Deep Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtualization Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's most valuable features are routing features and service quality."
"Juniper is more flexible with the commit check and the commit confirmed command. The design of the forwarding and contract plan in the operating system is very important for the performance when we have very big traffic."
"It is easy for me to go in and update settings, make changes, or add/remove rules or security."
"The dashboard, customization, API, and pricing are good."
"The initial setup is pretty simple."
"It's a very powerful solution and the firewalls offer high performance"
"The features we found most valuable are using the IDS and IPS during protection. The application filtering feature is great."
"The hardware is stable."
"The tool provides information on server activities and hosts."
"We've found stability to be great so far."
"Automated virtual patching is a good feature."
"It's scalable."
"It can scale well."
"The customer service/technical support for this solution is very fast."
"It provides a comprehensive feature set and a strong security baseline for us with integrations into other security tools."
"The user interface is the most valuable feature."
"We worked with Cisco's support and Juniper's support and there are some differences, to be honest, Cisco is more available and is more competent at addressing our cases."
"It is pretty complex to manage and could be easier."
"The pricing still needs some improvement."
"The GUI really needs a lot of work, and it has got worse with successive version updates."
"Fortinet is more user friendly than Juniper. In terms of remote access, I actually prefer using Fortinet. It's much easier to configure."
"The reporting can be improved."
"The solution should consider improving its licensing policies."
"In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to the GUI because it isn't very good."
"The solution could use more integration."
"We'd like to have more application control."
"Another issue is if I want to suggest this solution to a customer, we won't get the pricing immediately, which is a major problem."
"When implementing this solution, sometimes we have challenges with SQL migration."
"It would be better if they merge a few features into one product. For example, they have an encryption feature that is separately sold. If they could merge it with Apex One or any endpoint security solution, maybe it would also be good for the end user."
"Trend Micro is scalable if you have the budget for it."
"f it had the capability of generating retroactive alerts it would be helpful."
"Deep Security's most valuable features are antivirus and host intrusion detection."
Juniper vSRX is ranked 3rd in Virtualization Security with 33 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 81 reviews. Juniper vSRX is rated 7.8, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Juniper vSRX writes "Fast with good usability and fairly scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "High availability, effective VPM, and responsive support". Juniper vSRX is most compared with Juniper SRX Series Firewall, Azure Firewall, Meraki MX, Cisco Secure Firewall and Zscaler Cloud Firewall, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and Trellix Endpoint Security. See our Juniper vSRX vs. Trend Micro Deep Security report.
See our list of best Virtualization Security vendors.
We monitor all Virtualization Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.