We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Security and Trend Micro Deep Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)."It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"I have found the most valuable features to be the ability to manage the solution from anywhere and having an overview of the companies security."
"Some of McAfee Endpoint Security's main features are it has benefits over normal conventional antivirus solutions because it works much faster."
"It's quite easy to install agents."
"Their malware detection rate is excellent for all type of devices and the anti-theft products are good and easy to use."
"What I like best is the integrated end-to-end security that works with the security information and events manager."
"The initial setup of Trellix Endpoint Security was straightforward."
"Automatic user recovery prior to Windows booting up."
"The endpoint security, antivirus and firewall are the most valuable features of Trellix Endpoint Security."
"You can scale the solution to different versions."
"We use the solution to detect malicious threats, secure the endpoints, and disable the UFT."
"There is a degree of set it and forget it in regards to the actual endpoints and what you can do with the console, which is nice."
"We find that their technical support team is always accessible and willing to assist."
"The initial setup was straightforward and we didn't have any problem with it."
"It's easy to use and the interface is simple."
"Automated virtual patching is a good feature."
"It provides a comprehensive feature set and a strong security baseline for us with integrations into other security tools."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"The support needs improvement."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"Detections could be improved."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"Technical support is an area that can be improved because sometimes, the response time is a bit slow and the explanation is short."
"We’re facing remote installation issues sometimes:"
"The solution could provide open XDR in addition to EDR."
"They can make it free, but that's not going to happen."
"The VirusScan needs to improve in order to detect ransomware and other advanced threats."
"The product is not easy to use."
"We would like to see all the features available on cloud."
"The solution could use better updates and fewer bugs."
"f it had the capability of generating retroactive alerts it would be helpful."
"The situation with the currency in Turkey makes this solution a little bit on the expensive side, and if it were lowered then it would be more competitive."
"Installation and operations may have issues on some machines owing to their configuration of the network cards as the product is a DPI driver."
"The tool needs to improve its subscription."
"It would be better if they merge a few features into one product. For example, they have an encryption feature that is separately sold. If they could merge it with Apex One or any endpoint security solution, maybe it would also be good for the end user."
"We are not very happy with Trend Micro Deep Security since it is not able to detect many viruses and bugs."
"AWS products could become more compatible with intrusion detection products leveraging help from Trend Micro."
"The product isn't very user-friendly."
Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 95 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 81 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "High availability, effective VPM, and responsive support". Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.