We performed a comparison between LogicManager and RSA Archer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."Out of the box solution that doesn't require any special setup."
"First of all, its access control feature where it provides application level access, solution level access, and even recall access, as well."
"The product is very flexible."
"The part I liked about Archer was the risk assessment for deficiencies and being able to use it there."
"From my perspective, because I've always done it as a consultant, I do like the way it is configured. They've gone into changing the application builder interface, so it is even easier. When you're working with users, it is really easy to show them how to do things quickly and how to configure, change, and design stuff quickly."
"It is enterprise-wide accessible. So, it is very helpful for all the employees in our bank. They can log in and do their risk management activities. It has a few inbuilt modules that are helpful for doing risk management activities, such as issue management, risk identification, risk assessment, and policy exception management. It also has some inbuilt workflows inside these modules. They are also helpful."
"Archer has simplified our security audits. It's made it easier to raise and trigger questionnaires to customers."
"I like how Archer requires very little programming ability. A person with minimum coding experience can configure the necessary fields in Archer. It's more of a drag-and-drop solution."
"RSA is a very rich application. I like its adaptive suggestion, where based on your users and the class of data, it can actually recommend you the proper control to choose. For example, we have been using PCI DSS as an NIST. So based on application feedback, it will provide you with a suggestion on which control objective needs to be set. Based on that, you can make a decision—you don't need to take the suggestion, but you can customize that particular provided suggestion. RSA Archer's workflow is also good, in terms of process automation."
"A little too expensive."
"There were so many problems that we had found. One time, the search index was not working. We also faced slowness in Archer, but I resolved this issue."
"The ticket handling process could be improved."
"The solution as a whole could be simplified."
"It would be nice if RSA Archer featured more customization. When customers are updating, they should be notified whether certain updates are optional. The install screen should not proceed to the next page unless we make some selections about which updates we want to install."
"Some of the error reporting isn't very clear. When you're looking for information on error codes, you got to do a lot of digging."
"The design and advanced workflow need to be improved."
"The solution can be a little slow due to the Silverlight feature."
"Its customization features could be better."
Earn 20 points
LogicManager is ranked 21st in GRC while RSA Archer is ranked 1st in GRC with 38 reviews. LogicManager is rated 8.0, while RSA Archer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of LogicManager writes "Out of the box and ready to go with excellent support available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich application with good workflow, but search feature needs improvement". LogicManager is most compared with , whereas RSA Archer is most compared with OneTrust GRC, IBM OpenPages, MetricStream, Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance and Workiva Wdesk.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.