We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer and Palo Alto Networks Panorama based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewall Security Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Firewall Analyzer helps our organization to fulfill the compliance requirement as per ISO 27001, managing the network security effectively."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a very user-friendly tool compared to other solutions."
"The most valuable features of the ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer are the monitoring of the full management of the network elements and the inventory of the infrastructure."
"I found the reporting to be useful because not only can I go back months, but it lists the individual URLs and the time that a particular person visited."
"Overall the solution does a good job."
"Firewall Analyzer is easy to work with."
"Panorama enables you to provision all your firewalls and other things as a cluster. It is quite useful for that."
"Our team has the option to make configuration changes at any given time."
"The most valuable item is centralization and we can get all of the router bases in a single window."
"I like its flexibility."
"The product features allow the capacity to take effective, advanced security measures."
"I found logging and management features the most valuable in Palo Alto Networks Panorama. Another good feature of the product is that it lets you define global firewall policies and templates."
"Managing the firewalls in the branch locations from a central management console is easier."
"I would improve the management. I need to view charts and traffic statistics, but the management console doesn't share that information with me."
"If there is a need to get some customized report or anything, ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer takes some time."
"The stability is so-so. There are always memory issues, but the solution is working great apart from that."
"The solution lacks a lot of features that other products have in the marketplace."
"ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer can improve by having better monitoring of all features from firewalls. We are using Kibana in order to monitor parts that this solution does not record. For example, having more correlation and proactive monitoring in some activity or scenario."
"It would be awesome if the product could monitor services for applications."
"Customer support can improve."
"The ability to add scheduled jobs would be a significant improvement. Panorama has the ability to push out OS updates, but it would be nice to be able to schedule those updates so not to affect the site during normal business hours."
"The notification and alerting system could be improved."
"The solution could improve by having a true single pane of glass environment for unified management. At the present time, you still have to use three or four different solutions to bring everything together."
"The licensing costs are quite high."
"An area for improvement would be the connectivity, which sometimes means logs can be slow to display."
"When creating remote access for users, it would be beneficial to be able to base the object on on-premises or the cloud."
"It is very hard to understand the platform. It is not easy and user-friendly. You need a lot of experience to use Panorama. It is very complex, and you must know exactly what to do. I would like to have a more user-friendly product. FortiManager is comparatively very easy to use. It would be good if Panorama improves in terms of user-friendliness. It is also harder to use than Palo Alto Firewalls."
More ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer is ranked 11th in Firewall Security Management with 7 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is ranked 3rd in Firewall Security Management with 81 reviews. ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer is rated 8.2, while Palo Alto Networks Panorama is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer writes "Offers good integration features and is user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Panorama writes "Built-in proxy with the ability to maintain your own policies". ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer is most compared with AlgoSec, Tufin Orchestration Suite, FireMon Security Manager and Skybox Security Suite, whereas Palo Alto Networks Panorama is most compared with AWS Firewall Manager, AlgoSec, Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, Tufin Orchestration Suite and Cisco Defense Orchestrator. See our ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama report.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
