We performed a comparison between Microsoft Dynamics AX and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."A valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is that it is stable."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Dynamics AX is that it fulfills our requirements. We haven't had any issues with performance."
"From a developer's perspective, the architecture of Dynamics has a well-designed security layer, which prevents coding issues between different layers. This is a significant advantage."
"The response time of the solution is very good."
"The performance is good."
"The tool's most valuable feature is reporting."
"The production is a valuable feature."
"The relation between CRM and Sales, that's the main strength of this ERP."
"I have found the user interface very modern and it has simplified many user jobs, such as the embedded logistics. They have introduced central finance which has been a benefit."
"The speed of executing reports has increased significantly. We no longer need day-minus-one business processing."
"S/4HANA offers a lot of additional capability with respect to performance due to its in-built architecture for many functions including finance, production, quality, manufacturing, inventory or sales distribution and logistics."
"S4HANA is a completely integrated solution. It's an end-to-end ERP system with strong manufacturing and financial integration, which is not common among ERPs. And it's a solution that's driven by industry best practices."
"The tool's most valuable features are ease of use, high availability, and connectivity."
"One of the most valuable features is the in-memory database."
"It is the most stable solution provided by SAP and can be used on all levels."
"The functionality of SAP S4HANA is very good when comparing it to others, such as Oracle, Microsoft, and other ERP solutions."
"There is also slowness in database backup."
"The user interface could be better."
"There should be the capability for users to enhance the application by using a low-code or no-code product from the Microsoft family."
"The on-premises and desktop versions are not user-friendly."
"The product is standardised across industries so it is not a good fit for all types of sectors."
"The support here in Turkey could be better. However, the international support is good."
"Microsoft needs more presence in our region to help with management and maintenance."
"There is room for improvement when handling various currencies within the current Microsoft Dynamics AX system."
"I think the user interface still needs improvement. While efforts are being made to enhance and make it more user-friendly, there are still shortcomings. Fiori is a great step forward, but work must be done. So, I believe SAP S/4HANA should focus more on improving GUI access. We also had a difficult time migrating the fixed assets."
"It requires a lot of planning to implement the product correctly."
"Their yearly licensing is expensive. Improvements are needed on the user experience level and digital work."
"The cost of the solution is quite high. It needs to be adjusted."
"In an upcoming release, it would be beneficial to have more practical intelligence in the system, such as protective maintenance, or artificial intelligence."
"This product would be improved by adding more reports."
"The user interface should be much more convenient and user-friendly."
"We are always looking for a better user experience. We would like to see more consolidation in SAP S4HANA because of all the financial compliance and regulatory changes."
Microsoft Dynamics AX is ranked 6th in ERP with 52 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 75 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics AX is rated 7.6, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics AX writes "A stable product that offers excellent ROI and reliable technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". Microsoft Dynamics AX is most compared with SAP ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle E-Business Suite, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP and Microsoft Dynamics GP, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Anaplan. See our Microsoft Dynamics AX vs. SAP S/4HANA report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.